london 2012 geography case study

GeographyCaseStudy.Com

Detailed resources for pre-university Geography students

Case study: London Olympics 2012

By Matt Burdett, 17 January 2018

On this page, we look at the London Olympics of 2012 as a case study of the costs and benefits for one country hosting an international sports event.

Why was London chosen?

London competed with other cities to host the 2012 Olympics. It was chosen from nine cities, with five shortlisted to make formal bids (Paris, Madrid, Moscow, London, and New York). London won the final round, beating Paris by 54 votes to 50.

It seems likely that there was a political influence in the decision – such as the French president insulting the Finnish delegation by complaining about the quality of Finnish food. However, the criteria of the IOC included government support and public opinion, city infrastructure (such as transport), sports venues and experience, olympic village and accommodation, environmental impact and legacy, safety and security, and finance. The following factors were partly responsible for the success of the bid:

• Youth engagement in sport was one of the pillars of London’s bit
• Sustainability and ‘legacy’ were pillars of London’s bid
• Regeneration was emphasised as part of the bid: the IOC was shown photos of the derelict former industrial areas
• The UK government had decided to focus its Olympic bids on London after failing to win the Games in 1992, 1996 and 2000 with bids from Birmingham and Manchester (two other major UK cities)
• Gender and age issues: most of those who spoke in the Paris presentation were male and middle aged; the London presentation included children and represented a multicultural London
• Financial: the British government was ready to back any over-spend on the construction of Games facilities. The initial estimate of GBP2.2bn was totally wrong and the games eventually cost around GBP10bn!

A further issue was the very local focus of London’s bid. Rather than being simply shown as a city- or country-wide bid, it suggested that the Olympics would have a lasting tangible impact on a deprived area of London, called Stratford.

The choice of Stratford in London

The area chosen for the main Olympic facilities was a relatively deprived part of London:

The area was therefore identifiably in need of regeneration and expected to benefit from improvements to infrastructure that would mean:

• Location of main venue just seven minutes by train from Central London
• London’s bid was one of the most compact Olympic Parks – only about 2 ½ square kilometres, so minimal impact on land use in the area
• Sizeable available brownfield sites for redevelopment, as well as the green spaces of the Lower Lea Valley, so there would be opportunity for further growth
• Development of a major transport hub in the form of Stratford International Station
• The athlete’s village was planned to be converted into 2818 new homes, of which about 40% would be ‘affordable’ homes for low and middle income families and disabled people
• Emphasis on urban regeneration: the swimming pools were planned for conversion into public pools after the Games
• Suitable location for further post-Games industry e.g. the media centre, where 20,000 people worked during the Games, was planned for conversion into one of Europe’s largest data storage centres

The costs and benefits of hosting the Games

Whether the Games were cost-effective depends very much on the perspective of the individual. Socially there were many benefits (see below) but these were not always long-lived, and participation in sport has now returned to pre-2012 levels. Economically, the Games occurred during the recovery from the global financial crisis of 2008-10, and many people felt that the approximate cost of GBP10bn to be too high, despite the lasting benefits to the environment and the future of the economy. Over the total period of the Olympics, some sources suggest “the city brought in around US$3.5 billion in revenues, and spent in excess US$18 billion – a negative balance of $14 billion plus” (Zimbalist, 2015).

However, many people feel that the London Games were overall a success, and provided a benefit to the city. It should be remembered that London is already the world’s second most globalised city (Dessibourg, Hales, and Mendoza Peña, 2017) and has been in that position since the index began in 2008. London has great wealth and experience in putting on large events and is used to welcoming visitors from around the world, so it was organisationally capable of running the Olympics. Other cities have fared less well with the legacy of such complex and expensive events.

• Eventual cost nearly £10 billion paid for by lottery fund so other things lose out e.g. arts
• Massive construction scheme lasting years disrupts local communities
• Better image for London and East End
• New sports venues around London and elsewhere e.g. sailing in Weymouth
• The UK government invested GBP 300 million to transform the Olympic site into the “Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park”, which includes housing, new schools, health centres, business space and sports venues.
• The first Join In weekend (encouraging volunteerism as the profile was increased from volunteers at the Olympics), in August 2012, featured over 6,000 events.
• 9000 new homes in total
• The Olympic Village was converted into more than 2,800 flats in 11 residential plots, with spacious courtyards, gardens and balconies.
• Five new neighbourhoods are being established around the park to include 11,000 residences, one third of which will be affordable housing
• The London Olympic Athletes’ Village is the largest sustainable homes project in the UK.

Education and sports participation

• A new youth sport strategy for the UK invested GBP1bn in youth sport over the five years following the Games and created 6,000 new community sports clubs.
• The Department of Education provided GBP 65 million to encourage efforts by physical education teachers to organise competitive sports, embed best practice and train primary school teachers.
• The official London 2012 education programme “Get Set” operated over a four-year period across the UK providing flexible teaching resources for over 25,000 schools and 6.5 million young people to assist them in learning more about the London 2012 Games, the Olympic and Paralympic values and global citizenship. An impressive 85 per cent of UK schools signed up to this programme
• The Olympic and Paralympic Games inspired over 2,000 community projects designed to educate young people in the UK about sport, health & fitness, art and Olympic values.

Environmental and general infrastructure

• Some people lost homes, allotments, and areas for fishing
• Olympic Park ‘largest [new] urban park in Europe for 150 years’ (ODA, 2015)
• Prior to construction, the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA, 2015) excavated and cleaned more than 2.3 million cubic metres of contaminated soil.
• Transport for London invested GBP 6.5 billion in transport infrastructure in preparation for the 2012 Games.
• Ten railway lines and 30 new bridges continue to connect London communities after the Games.
• The UK’s Home Office (the ministry of the interior) invested GBP 40 million in communications upgrades for London’s Underground, doubling radio capacity at key stations to help authorities deal with any emergency.
• At least 60 Games-related projects promoted greener travel, including a GBP 10 million investment to upgrade pedestrian and cycling routes across London.
• A fleet of 200 electric vehicles transported Olympians, supported by 120 charging stations that created the UK’s largest network of recharging points. The charging stations continue to support emission-free travel long after the Games
• More than 98 percent of the demolition waste from decrepit buildings that were torn down was recycled.
• Organisers helped develop 45 hectares of habitat, with a 10-year ecological management plan to encourage biodiversity.
• 300,000 plants were planted in the Olympic Park’s wetland area.
• Over 1,000 new trees were planted in East London.
• 380 businesses relocated away from park to make way for Olympics
• Cost of living in the area for poorer people will increase
• 3000 new jobs (ODA, 2015)
• Factoring in pre-Games construction and other early Games-related economic activity, an Oxford Economics study commissioned by the Lloyds banking group estimates that the Games will generate GBP 16.5 billion for the British economy from 2005 to 2017.
• During July and August 2012, visitors spent about GBP 760 million in the UK, averaging GBP 1,290 per person – almost double the normal amount.
• Expenditure from overseas visitors in August, including Games ticket sales, totalled GBP 4.5 billion
• 75 pence of every pound spent on the Olympics went towards providing a lasting legacy to East London residents.
• Independent experts said Games preparations were a major factor behind a 1.2 percent reduction in London’s unemployment rate in early 2012.
• More than 46,000 people worked on the Olympic Park and Olympic Village, 10 percent of whom were previously unemployed.
• The five Host Boroughs surrounding the Olympic Park provided nearly a quarter of the workforce throughout the project. For example, the Host Borough of Newham had 4,364 residents employed by LOCOG or by their contractors and a further 5,518 employed indirectly on the Games in the lead-up and at Games time.
• The (new) Westfield Stratford shopping centre houses 250 retailers, 70 dining establishments and represents a GBP 1.4 billion investment in East London.
• The Westfield Stratford shopping centre created 10,000 permanent new jobs from day one, including 2,000 for local people who were previously unemployed.

Anonymous, no date. Why was London chosen to host the 2012 Olympiad? https://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/1E506FE2-3179-439C-81F2-B43D0B97D058/0/CGT_NetRaising_8Olympicpresentation.pdf Accessed 17 January 2018.

Dessibourg, Hales, and Mendoza Peña, 2017. Global Cities 2017. https://www.atkearney.com/global-cities/full-report Accessed 17 January 2018.

Dugan, E. 2013. Olympics legacy: Did the Games succeed in rejuvenating East London? http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/olympics/olympics-legacy-did-the-games-succeed-in-rejuvenating-east-london-8711691.html Accessed 17 January 2018.

ODA [Olympic Delivery Authority], 2015. Olympic Delivery Authority 2006-2014 – final report. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/olympic-delivery-authority-report Accessed 17 January 2018.

Stevens, A. 2008. 2012 London Olympics to regenerate one of the poorest areas of the capital http://www.citymayors.com/sport/2012-olympics-london.html Accessed 17 January 2018.

Wihbey, J. 2016. Olympics and their economic impact: Updated research roundup. https://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/infrastructure-government/economic-and-cultural-benefits-of-the-olympics-research-roundup Accessed 17 January 2018.

Zimbalist, 2018. The Illusory Economic Gains from Hosting the Olympics World Cup. In World Economics, 16, issue 1, p. 35-42, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wej:wldecn:606 . Accessed 17 January 2018.

Case study: London Olympics 2012: Learning activities

• Outline the political, social, economic and environmental reasons why London was chosen for the 2012 Games. [8]
• Suggest reasons why some people feel that the Games were not an appropriate way to spend the money. [4]
• Suggest why some people feel that the Games provided a tangible legacy. [3]
• Create a spider diagram showing at least three social impacts, three economic impacts and three environmental impacts of the Games.
• Do you consider that the Games were a sustainable event? Explain your answer. [4]
• Overall, do you think that the Games were a success? Why? [6]

Other tasks

Imagine that you live in the area that is going to be transformed by the Games. Write a letter to the International Olympic Committee explaining why you do or don’t want the Games to come to London. Remember to attempt a counter-argument and rebuttal, and that this is a formal letter so you should be using formal ‘business’ language.

Going further

This site has a great number of additional sources that you could explore, for example if you are looking at the Olympics for the purposes of an extended essay. Page 11 is especially good.

• http://crln.acrl.org/content/75/1/24.full

Look at these sites for more in-depth information.

• http://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/23434844
• https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/02/140221-olympics-sochi-rio-de-janeiro-london-boris-johnson-montreal-athens-world/
• https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2014/02/03/270950685/did-london-get-an-economic-boost-from-the-2012-olympics
• https://d2rpq8wtqka5kg.cloudfront.net/129049/open20120701120000.pdf?Expires=1511793842&Signature=R043y307dmxOAQKbZckf67uuGsQhQUZ3~Fuml0zdCMn0Y2ZjYobP36CAdEROzjj4QvHUN0aFZKha~v7h8RAt1XLxQKkIZGyf6Z5h3N~U01FZv~N5u4gIXs~z43IkDQMr~1ShM9I4Px7hWR6~yG7TRi57jLt8x3Ti~2HiHGZYAiDpXP68St7EadjRxLr6HDZRtf-mOBRGCSKCxx7S-bhDyZWlDqR8kP4jayZQr7UtYoN-qSbdz6SqNBd3AIrQNhaCLp51mWZkSFex8XdXJblqSZDlAgdPYHvGLyD6wsZLSZAmvUE9MDQ4ol~SOhQ9qI9-zggFSUgaagHj1mPDR9Ak9A__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJVGCNMR6FQV6VYIA

And even further:

• http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Reference_documents_Factsheets/London_2012_Facts_and_Figures-eng.pdf Interesting facts in general.
• http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_282767.pdf Visitors impact – especially useful on p8
• http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ott/overseas-travel-and-tourism—monthly-release/august-2012/index.html Also pretty strong, same basic source as above but with other links that might be useful.

Share this:

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Find Study Materials for

• Business Studies
• Combined Science
• Computer Science
• Engineering
• English Literature
• Environmental Science
• Human Geography
• Macroeconomics
• Microeconomics
• Social Studies
• Browse all subjects
• Read our Magazine

Create Study Materials

Dive into the fascinating depths of the Olympic Park Case Study, a detailed exploration of one of the world's most dynamic urban regeneration projects. Offering a comprehensive understanding of the key factors that drove its success, this article serves as an authentic guide. Learn about the local and environmental challenges faced, the inventive solutions implemented, and the significant impacts of this extraordinary case study. Whether it's the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, or the wider London Olympic Park, you will discover the intrinsic details and noteworthy insights that have been gained from this transformative endeavour.

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

• Olympic Park Case Study
• Explanations
• StudySmarter AI
• Textbook Solutions
• London Urbanisation
• Rio de Janeiro Case Study
• UK Population Distribution
• Urban Issues and Challenges
• Changing Economic World
• Coasts Geography
• Diverse Places
• Dynamic Landscapes
• Energy Security
• Glaciated Landscapes
• Global Resource Management
• Globalisation
• Health And Human Rights
• Living With The Physical Environment
• Living World
• Migration and Identity
• Regenerating Places
• River Landscapes
• Superpowers of the World
• Sustainable Urban Development
• Water Cycle

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Understanding the Olympic Park Case Study

When you delve into the realm of geography, you often encounter fascinating multi-dimensional studies like the Olympic Park Case Study. This intriguing example throws light on how major global events can contribute positively to urban development and regeneration.

An Olympic Park is a sports complex built for the Olympic Games. It typically includes sporting, recreational, and ancillary facilities used during and after the events.

An Overview of the Olympic Park Case Study

In the exciting world of geographical studies, the Olympic Park Case Study stands out as a shining example of urban regeneration. This case study chiefly focuses on the Olympic Park constructed for the 2012 London Olympics.

Key details of this project are :

The site's former use: The area prior to redevelopment was a neglected, inequalities affected part of East London with many challenges, including high deprivation levels and infrastructure shortcomings.

Infrastructure created: The Olympic Park regeneration project was vast, covering an area of 2.5 square km.\( {\displaystyle \text{Area} =2.5 \text{km}^{2}} \)

This massive development saw the construction of venues for the Games, residential buildings, parks, and world-class infrastructure.

Post-Games use: Following the Games, the legacy plan aimed to transform East London, improving the quality of life and creating a sustainable community.

The Olympic Park regeneration project has since been hailed as a global model for urban regeneration, inspiring similar developments worldwide.

Key Factors in the Olympic Park Case Study

The Olympic Park Case Study is packed with a notable depth of dimensions.

• The planning process: a comprehensive plan, well-thought-out and executed meticulously.
• Impact on the local economy: A substantial increase in potential job opportunities and economic growth within the region.
• Geographical considerations: Choices in terms of location, dealing with existing geographical obstacles, and sustainability issues.

Insight into these key factors provides an essential understanding of why this redevelopment project has been so successful.

Sustainability in this context refers to the project's capacity to maintain its operations and values over the long term without negatively affecting the surrounding environment or society.

As you further delve into the Olympic Park Case Study, you will gain deeper insights into the world of Geography through the lens of urban regeneration.

Into the Details: Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study

Shifting the focus to the heart of our discussion - the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study. This case study offers a deeper and more intricate exploration of the impact of the Olympic Games, coupled with the strategic regeneration of a deprived urban area. It's a remarkable blend of sports, urban planning, and geography.

Understanding the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study

When you delve into the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study, it feels like unravelling a multifaceted narrative laden with geographical significance. The park, formerly known as the Olympic Park , was renamed to honour Queen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee in 2012.

A Diamond Jubilee is a celebration held to mark a 60th anniversary. In this case, it marked the 60th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II's reign.

The vast 560-acre Park is located in Stratford, East London , and was developed to host the 2012 London Olympics and Paralympics. It was one of the most significant urban transformations in the UK for decades.

The ambitious project's key objectives included improving the local economy, environment, social aspects, and sports infrastructure. It was not just about hosting the Olympics but about benefiting the local community long after the Games. That's what makes it a prime case study in geography, where studying the interaction between people and places holds significance.

Interestingly, the construction team for the Olympic Park focused on using recycled materials whenever possible. For example, the concrete used was made of 30% recycled content, showing an admirable commitment to sustainable construction.

Major Aspects of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study

Diving into the major aspects of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study, you'll discover some fascinating facts and considerations. Among them, the project's planning and execution, the engagement with the local community, its socio-economic impact, and last but not least, the focus on sustainability .

Sustainability refers to meeting our own needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It intertwines with all aspects of human life, from economic growth and social inclusiveness to environmental protection.

Let's break down these major aspects:

• Planning and execution: Comprehensive masterplanning allowed for meticulous execution. The team behind this ambitious project prioritised health and safety, efficient management, and timely delivery.
• Community engagement: Community involvement was integral to the project. Activities included consultations, local employment, and volunteer opportunities, all aimed at fostering community spirit.
• Socio-economic impact: The project significantly contributed to East London's socio-economic development, bringing in investments, creating jobs, and attracting businesses.
• Sustainability: Sustainability was at the heart of the project. It was built into the design, construction, and legacy of the Park.

One example of sustainability was the creation of the UK's largest man-made wetland in over a century. This wetland provides a habitat for wildlife and manages flood risk in the area.

The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study provides a comprehensive look at how major sporting events can serve as a catalyst for considerable urban regeneration. The study showcases how strategic planning, sociological insight, and environmental stewardliness can combine to create a lasting legacy of growth and development.

Exploring the London Olympic Park Case Study

When it comes to exploring the intersection of geography and large-scale urban regeneration projects, the London Olympic Park Case Study stands as a testament to the transformative power of such initiatives. This thorough investigation unearths how the 2012 Olympic Games served as an opportunity to initiate widespread change, reshaping and revitalising an entire district of London.

A Detailed Look at the London Olympic Park Case Study

An in-depth dive into the story behind the London Olympic Park brings to light its intriguing genesis, multifaceted execution, and its ongoing impact on the local community and beyond.

Before the ambitious regeneration project took shape, the area now known as the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park was characterised by industrial wasteland, rundown buildings, and a lack of sufficient infrastructure.

The project planning aimed at not merely building a temporary sports facility, but the long-term strategy focused on revitalising the entire community—building new homes, commercial spaces, parks and sports facilities that would continue to serve the community and attract visitors long after the Games concluded.

The massive 2.5-square km area was to host a collection of Olympic venues on a grand scale. These included the Olympic Stadium, the Aquatics Centre, the Velodrome, and the IBC/MPC complex that was set up to serve the world’s media during the Games.

Apart from these, the project also involved a comprehensive upgrade of the local infrastructure including transport links, power, sewage and water systems, ensuring the area was well-equipped to handle the influx of spectators during the Games, while serving as a robust foundation for future growth.

Infrastructure refers to the fundamental physical and organisational structures, facilities, and systems required for the operation of a city or society. This includes transportation, utilities, and various public services.

Noteworthy Insights from the London Olympic Park Case Study

The London Olympic Park Case Study is a treasure trove of valuable insights, examining not only the planning and development aspects but also the socio-economic and environmental impacts of the project.

A key aspect that stands out in this case study is the deliberate focus on creating a sustainable legacy . A significant part of this was the emphasis on 'green' construction methods. For instance, over 98% of the demolition materials from the old structures were recycled and used in the new development.

Some of the most noteworthy accomplishments include:

• Job creation: The project resulted in the employment of around 30,000 workers during its development phase and continues to provide an economic boost to the local community through the creation of jobs and businesses.
• Urban regeneration: The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park has breathed new life into the Stratford area, transforming it from a deprived to a thriving community.
• Infrastructure development: Significant upgrade of public infrastructure, including roads, bridges, utilities, and public transportation, enhancing the overall quality of life in the area.
• Environmental protection: Sustainable construction methods and the development of green spaces, contributing to the global sustainability agenda.

Urban regeneration is the process of redeveloping underused or derelict urban areas to bring about physical and economic improvements. This often involves upgrades to infrastructure, the creation of new job opportunities, and improvements to the local environment.

The London Olympic Park Case Study is a shining example of how astute planning, sustainable practices, and a community-centric approach can lead to transformative urban development, making it an intriguing area of study in the broader field of geography.

The Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study

The Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study serves as an impressive beacon of urban renewal and sustainable development. It showcases the strategic alignment of sports, urban planning, community needs, and environmental considerations to reimagine and revitalise a significant part of East London.

An Examination of the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study

Undertaking a detailed exploration of the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study, you'll be introduced to a remarkable transformation story, marked by careful planning, innovative design, social upliftment, and environmental safeguarding.

Focusing on the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, the case study takes you through the park's journey from being an underutilised and neglected area to a vibrant, modern and sustainable community-space post the 2012 London Olympics. Through the lens of geography and urban planning, this study sheds light on the interplay of spatial relationships, socio-economic factors, and biodiversity concerns that shaped this project.

For instance, the transformation took into account the existing waterways in the area. These were not only cleaned and protected, but also seamlessly integrated into the park's layout to enhance the space's attractiveness and support local biodiversity.

The fact that designs encouraged the use of repurposed materials from the site during construction is an exemplar of sustainable practices. Moreover, through the creation of renewable energy sources within the park, a commitment to protecting the environment for the long term was demonstrated.

The case study further examines the positive social impact resulting from the project. The development of new residential areas, creation of numerous jobs, focus on public access, and commitment to maintaining a communal recreational space emphasised people's needs and improved the quality of life.

Quality of life is a measure of the general well-being and satisfaction derived from a combination of factors like physical health, employment, education, environmental quality and recreational opportunities.

Important Factors in the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study

Investigating important factors within the scope of the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study reveals key takeaways spanning from design strategies and sustainability practices to social integration and urban planning.

Four crucial aspects underpinning the success of the project were:

• Design strategy: Careful and detailed planning took into consideration the geographical features and accommodated infrastructural needs, community areas, and the overall aesthetic appeal.
• Sustainability practices: Eco-friendly construction methods and renewable energy sources were central in laying out foundations and future developments in the park, aligning with global sustainability goals.
• Social integration: Factoring in the needs of the local community ensured long-term benefits. This is apparent in the creation of housing, business opportunities, and recreational spaces.
• Urban planning: Key infrastructural upgrades, including improved transportation links, played a significant role in revitalising East London and connecting it efficiently with wider London.

A unique example of urban planning was the establishment of the Chobham Academy within the Olympic Park. This institution welcomed students regardless of their ages or abilities, acting as a hub for education and community events right from the start.

Urban planning is a technical and political process concerned with the use of land and design of the urban environment, encompassing air, water, and infrastructure passing into and out of urban areas. It effectively promotes sustainability, health, and safety in communities.

These key insights from the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study provide a nuanced understanding of the planning, execution, and impact of a redevelopment at such a grand scale. Several aspects highlighted in this example demonstrate the complexities and intricacies of balancing social, environmental, and logistical considerations - serving as a worthy referential case for urban geographers.

Olympic Park Case Study Challenges

Embarking on the ambitious Olympic Park regeneration project was far from smooth sailing. It was filled with considerable challenges, both predicted and unforeseen, adding layers of complexity to the tasks at hand. Despite these difficulties, the lessons learnt and triumphant overcoming of these hurdles make the journey even more intriguing.

Discovering the Challenges in the Olympic Park Case Study

Turning a mostly neglected area of East London into an impressive, modern, and sustainable community within a strict timeline was a considerable undertaking. The difficulties faced were vast, varied, and required innovative solutions.

Some of the notable challenges recorded in the Olympic Park Case Study include:

• Geographical constraints: The location of the site, with existing water bodies and undulating terrains, posed great difficulties during construction.
• Logistical issues: Managing an operation of this magnitude, with a myriad of parties involved and time-sensitive deliveries, was unquestionably challenging.
• Environmental considerations: Ensuring the development adhered to sustainability guidelines, with an aim to minimising carbon footprint and maximising the use of recycled materials, added an extra layer to the complexities.
• Community engagement: Meaningfully involving the local community, maintaining transparency, and ensuring minimal disruption to local lives was paramount but not without challenges.

Sustainability in urban development refers to the ability to accommodate population growth and development without depleting resources, causing detrimental environmental impact, or compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Logistical issues posed a significant challenge when it came to waste management. With the commitment to using recycled materials wherever possible, managing and sorting waste effectively was both an essential part of the project and a major logistical feat.

A particularly challenging aspect was ensuring the right balance between building sporting venues for the Olympics and creating spaces that would be relevant and beneficial to the community in the long term. This dual-purpose planning required forward-thinking and versatile design solutions.

Overcoming Challenges in the Olympic Park Case Study

Despite the seemingly insurmountable challenges posed by the Olympic Park regeneration project, exceptional planning, foresight, and problem-solving skills were leveraged to turn these obstacles into opportunities and lessons for future initiatives.

The solutions employed to tackle various challenges included:

• Clever design: The geographical constraints were addressed with innovative architecture and engineering solutions, using the existing natural features as assets rather than hindrances.
• Effective project management: A robust project management strategy handled logistical complexities. This involved streamlining communication, implementing strict schedules, and enforcing health and safety regulations.
• Emphasis on sustainability: Throughout the project, sustainability was made a priority, influencing design decisions, choice of materials, waste management methods, and even transport solutions for the Games.
• Community Consultation: A series of consultations, public meetings, feedback mechanisms, and updates ensured the local community was kept informed, engaged, and accommodated throughout the process.

Project Management is the application of processes, methods, skills, knowledge and experience to achieve specific project objectives according to the project acceptance criteria within agreed parameters. It includes initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing the work of a team to achieve specific goals and meet specific success criteria.

For example, to incorporate sustainability, the project introduced measures such as green travel plans, which recommended spectators to cycle, walk or use public transport to reach the Olympic venues, thereby reducing carbon emissions. This simple yet effective method reaffirmed the foundational principles of sustainable development pledged by the project.

Overcoming these complexities demonstrated the profound ability of the team behind the Olympic Park Case Study to face seemingly daunting obstacles and evolve stronger, constructing a legacy that still stands as an exemplar in urban regeneration.

Investigating the Olympic Park Environmental Case Study

Intricately woven into the Olympic Park Case Study is the notably significant Environmental Case Study. This perspective illuminates an essential aspect of any extensive urban planning project - its environmental footprint and how it contributes to achieving a sustainable future.

Factors in the Olympic Park Environmental Case Study

Deciphering the environmental facets of the Olympic Park Case Study provides a detailed view of the careful considerations and forward-thinking strategies employed to mitigate the project's environmental impacts. The studious approach to the environmental aspect of the project gave birth to several crucial factors that facilitated a sustainable outcome.

• Sustainable Infrastructure: Building from scratch provided a unique opportunity to incorporate sustainable design elements in all the park's infrastructure. Bio-diverse landscaping, green roofs, and sustainable drainage systems were some of the implemented green initiatives.
• Waste Management: With such a colossal construction project, dealing with waste was a significant challenge. The solution lay in an exceptional commitment to recycling. This initiative not only reduced landfill waste but also minimized the need for new materials.
• Energy Efficiency: One of the key focuses was creating an energy-efficient park, which led to the construction of a combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) plant on-site.
• Water conservation: Considering England's lack of water resources, incorporating water-saving measures into the project was paramount. Rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling, and water-efficient appliances were among the applied solutions.

Greywater is relatively clean wastewater from baths, sinks, washing machines, and other kitchen appliances. It can be recycled for uses such as toilet flushing and garden irrigation , offering an effective way to save water.

For example, the Olympic Stadium's roof illustrates sustainable infrastructure implementation. Its lightweight design used 2,500 tonnes less steel than traditional construction methods, while the top covering consisted of a recyclable PVC material, thereby reducing material usage and promoting recyclability.

Remarkably, the project succeeded in achieving a 50% reduction in carbon emissions through the combined effect of sustainable construction methods, efficient infrastructure and the use of the CCHP plant.

Key Impacts From the Olympic Park Environmental Case Study

The successful execution of a sustainability-focused approach in the Olympic Park project has led to demonstrable positive environmental impacts, qualifying it as an exceptional example of eco-friendly urban regeneration.

Carbon footprint is a measure of the impact our activities have on the environment in terms of the amount of greenhouse gases we produce. It's measured in units of carbon dioxide.

A remarkable feat is the accomplishment in waste management. With a commitment to minimising waste, an impressive 98-99% of construction waste was diverted from landfill, either reused or recycled back in the supply chain.

The lasting impacts from the project are not just confined to the location itself. With its visible commitment to sustainability, the Olympic Park project has set a precedent for future developments in London and beyond.

Olympic Park Case Study - Key takeaways

• The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study highlights the strategic planning, sociological insight, and environmental stewardliness involved in making a major sporting event contribute to significant urban regeneration.
• Before its transformation, the area known as the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park was characterised by industrial wasteland, rundown buildings, and a lack of sufficient infrastructure.
• The London Olympic Park Case Study showcases how sustainability was a crucial part of the construction, over 98% of the demolition materials from old structures were recycled and used in the new development.
• The Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study emphasises that the inclusion of design strategies, sustainability practices, social integration and urban planning were key to the success of the project. An example of this includes repurposing materials from the site during the construction phase as well as the creation of renewable energy sources within the park.
• The Olympic Park Case Study faced challenges including geographical constraints, logistic issues, environmental considerations and community engagement. Despite these, the project succeeded by finding innovative solutions to these problems.

Frequently Asked Questions about Olympic Park Case Study

--> how did the olympic park solve urban problems.

The Olympic park solved urban problems such as cleaning up the industrial site it was built on and working on water quality in River Lea. The athlete's village was turned into housing which was said to be affordable.

--> What were the challenges in building the Olympic Park?

There were several challenges:

• Economic - construction costs were higher than estimated.
• Education and sports - the Olympic Stadium is now used by West Ham United F.C. with high annual expenses.
• Social - businesses and people had to relocate. Furthermore, many jobs did not go to locals and construction jobs were temporary.
• Regeneration - many houses deemed 'affordable' were not actually affordable to the majority of the people, only the more affluent people. 

--> What happened to London's Olympic Park?

The London Olympic Park now serves different purposes. It was renamed Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and is open to the public for free to enjoy. The Athletes Village became East Village, a housing development. The Olympic stadium is now the London Stadium, home to the Premier League football club, West Ham United. The Aquatic Centre is London Aquatics Centre and is open to the public.

--> How has London's Olympic Park been regenerated?

London's Olympic Park has been regenerated by changing the functions of the infrastructure of the Olympic Games to serve the public and the local residents.

--> What are some of the issues involved in London's Olympic Park?

Some of the issues involving the London Olympic Park are that many properties with residents and businesses had to move to make space for the construction. Also, local wildlife was relocated for construction. The house and rental prices making it hard for locals to stay in the area.

Test your knowledge with multiple choice flashcards

Which statements are FALSE?

Why was the Olympic Park built over Stratford, Bow, Leyton and Hackney Wick?

Regenerating business developments to house companies such as Transport for London and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) bring _____ to the area.

Your score:

Join the StudySmarter App and learn efficiently with millions of flashcards and more!

Learn with 27 olympic park case study flashcards in the free studysmarter app.

Already have an account? Log in

The Olympic Park has been renamed Queen Victoria Olympic Park after the 2012 Games. 

What is urban regeneration?

Urban regeneration is when an urban area, such as a town or a city, is transformed by refurbishing buildings, building or improving infrastructure, and creating landscapes.

They were more deprived compared to the rest of the UK.

TRUE or FALSE:  After the games, the London Aquatics Centre was made accessible and affordable for the public to use.    

What was the Olympic Media Centre redeveloped into?

 The "East London Tech City" and "Here East"

of the users don't pass the Olympic Park Case Study quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

How would you like to learn this content?

Free geography cheat sheet!

Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.

Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

• Flashcards & Quizzes
• AI Study Assistant
• Study Planner
• Smart Note-Taking

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

This is still free to read, it's not a paywall.

You need to register to keep reading, create a free account to save this explanation..

Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!

By signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.

Entdecke Lernmaterial in der StudySmarter-App

Privacy Overview

UIC - London - Regeneration

The London Olympics of 2012 was a fantastic sporting spectacle and put the spotlight of the World on our capital city.  Part of the aims of the Olympics was to completely transform an area of East London that is lagging behind the rest, East London.  The idea was to leave a lasting legacy or impact not just for sport but for the urban area in the East of London.

The London 2012 Olympic Legacy was a plan to make sure that the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games had LONG TERM BENEFITS. This legacy was to cover 4 main areas; 1. Economic – supporting new jobs and skills, encouraging trade, inward investment and tourism 2. Sports – continuing elite success, development of more sports facilities and encouraging participation in schools sports and wider 3. Social and volunteering – inspiring others to volunteer and encouraging social change 4. Regeneration – reuse of venues, new homes, and improved transportation

The key for this unit is Legacy point 4 – urban regeneration.  Urban Regeneration is the whole sale improvement of the buildings and infrastructure of an area.   The Olympic athletes village was converted to a new housing area in London.

The areas hosting the Olympics like Stratford and nearby Tower Hamlets were in dire need of regeneration as they had; • a lot of abandoned old industrial sites, • low achievement at school in  terms of GCSE points score • industrial wastelands, • higher than average unemployment than the rest of London and • higher deprivation and poverty for the people that lived there • Lower household incomes then the London average as shown on the map below

There were many POSITIVES in the long run from the Olympics, in terms of regenerating East London socially, economically and environmentally.

NEXT TOPIC - UIC - Sustainability in Urban areas

©2015 Cool Geography

• Copyright Policy
• Privacy & Cookies
• Testimonials
• Feedback & support

Become a member and discover where geography can take you.

• Resources for ...
• The impact of ...

The impact of London 2012

London 2012: the most sustainable Olympic Games to date. That was premise on which the city based its bid. Boasting the most sustainable Olympic and Paralympic Stadium ever built and promising a zero-waste Games, it certainly appears that the ecological principles of the bid are being upheld ( London 2012 ). However, has this mega-event really been as green as it promised?

To find out, we spoke to Professor Allan Brimicombe, Head of the Centre for Geo-Information Studies at the University of East London. He uses data analysis and spatial modelling to solve complex problems, such as asking whether London 2012 is sustainable or not.

Allan is leading a series of impact studies for the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) to assess the environmental, socio-cultural economic effects of London 2012. 

Why did London 2012 commit to the vision of being the “first truly sustainable Games”?

London had to sell its bid to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and had tough competition from Paris and Madrid, who were also involved in the final rounds of bidding for the 2012 Games. Each city needed a Unique Selling Point (USP) to interest the client – in this case, the IOC. So this is all a question of branding.  Alongside London 2012’s overarching aim of ‘inspiring a generation’ the London Games also aimed to regenerate East London and the environmental impact was an important consideration within this.

Olympic Charter: Mission and role of IOC :

13. to encourage and support a responsible concern for environmental issues, to promote sustainable development in sport and to require that the Olympic Games are held accordingly 14. to promote a positive legacy from the Olympic Games to the host cities and host countries; Sustainability fits with the Olympic Charter’s aims of being of sustainable and promoting a positive legacy. If you are going to have a large transformational impact on East London – a transformation that is inspiring a generation – it makes sense for it not just to be here today and gone tomorrow. This legacy has to stick for decades to come and using a sustainable approach is more likely to make this happen.

If London 2012 was being branded as a 'truly sustainable' Games, who was it being sold to?

This was a vision being sold to the IOC, to commercial sponsors and also to Londoners. But, first and foremost, it had to be accepted by the IOC. Without a contract to host the Games, nothing would happen. At the same time, however, you need your sponsors and the nation behind you once you have won the bid to host the Games.

Within London, there was already a movement towards being greener, more environmentally friendly and, therefore, increasingly sustainable. We have seen this trend being reflected in Government policy for the last 10-15 years, and in the choices being made by consumers. London 2012’s commitment to sustainability fits with the general mood in Britain.

What does sustainability actually mean beyond being a buzzword?

It is a commitment to the wide use of resources in a way that will maximise the benefits and legacies from London 2012. This is not only about having a fun and successful Olympic Games. It is about rebranding and reusing existing facilities – such as ExCeL, Horse Guard’s Parade, the O2 arena and Wembley Stadium – as much as it is about producing a brand new Olympic Park. These existing facilities have been rebranded and it proves that not every Olympic venue has to be constructed from new.

Meanwhile, the Olympic Park itself was planned with strong sustainability values underscoring the use of resources and construction methods. For all the materials being used, there will be supply chains – some national and some international. Supply standards were built into the contracts of those supply chains. We now have an Olympic Village that has been built to a higher environmental standard than housing developments were previously constructed at; and with a lower carbon footprint.

Were there any major lessons learnt from the construction of the Olympic Park?

The idea that contaminated soil could be processed on site and re-used for mixing concrete or making road materials was a key innovation. Normally, contaminated soil would just be put in the back of a lorry and driven into the countryside somewhere to be dealt with.  So that was a major experiment which worked. Another major advancement was in the recycling and reuse of blackwater. 

Blackwater at the Olympic Park

The Olympic Park was committed to reducing the overall use of potable water by 40%. This was achieved by using treated sewage water (or blackwater) instead – a policy delivered through a partnership between the Olympic Delivery Authority and Thames Water. Blackwater was extracted from an existing Thames Water sewer before being treated in a combined sewage treatment works and drinking water treatment plant in Stratford. It was expected to produce around 574m3 of potable water per day, which will be used for flushing toilets, irrigation of grounds, rainwater harvesting top-up and cooling the energy centre on the Olympic Park. Thames Water will continue this as a research project for seven years beyond the Games.

The Olympics allowed these advancements to happen. I think the British engineering and construction industry will be able to export these kinds of developments around the world. I do not think we have seen these exportable technological innovations being developed in previous Games. They are the result of a commitment to a sustainable Games – not just in terms of the event, but in the whole construction process, right through to legacy. This meant that we had to break new ground, and I think we have done just that.

What direct impacts has London 2012 had on the area in and around the Olympic Park?

The Olympic Park was a seriously degraded and mostly derelict site under multiple ownership. It previously suffered from a major development restraint as a result of the power lines that passed overhead. This was a major problem because you cannot build underneath power lines. So the London Development Agency (LDA) had to buy up all of that land and root the power cables underground – a very expensive process.

By taking the land into single ownership, it allowed the whole area to be brought into productive use. This was important in priming the area for development – a process that involved decontamination and dealing with flooding risk. Without the catalyst of the Olympics, the area might have taken another 20 or 30 years before it was brought back into use and, even then, you would not have had the scale of development that we are seeing now.

We have heard a lot about the legacy surrounding London 2012. What do we mean by this?

It means that we achieve some long-term benefits from having hosted the Games. There may be some immediate benefits, such as a feel good factor in the nation. But because London was always on the tourist map, it will not necessarily benefit from the tourist industry as dramatically as Barcelona did following the 1992 Olympics.

But there can be catalytic effects from the Games, especially in transforming part of East London. The Olympic Games will not necessarily transform the heart of East London in itself. But, having transformed the area around the Olympic Park from a derelict 500 acres into a productive and developable 500 acres, there will hopefully be inward investment into the surrounding areas. This, it is hoped, should then provide employment opportunities and better housing, which generally leads to better levels of health and standards of living.

Do you think London 2012 will deliver this legacy far into the future?

These longer-term transformational effects that I have outlined will not work unless we continue to manage and promote inward investment into the area after the Olympics have finished. I think there are already some people and organisations in place to deliver this. For example, there is going to be the London Legacy Development Cooperation (LLDC), which will take charge of the publicly-owned sections of the Olympic Park.    Meanwhile, the five host boroughs have already got together and agreed that having the Olympics is not going to transform the heart of East London on its own. Instead, they agreed on a Single Regeneration Framework, which focuses on dealing with issues of health, housing, crime and job opportunities by 2031. So, at the moment, we have at least a 20-year horizon. But the legacy can go on for many more years after that.

Your final impact assessment report is due to be published in 2015. Will geographic research into the legacy continue beyond that?

There will continue to be opportunities for research into the legacy of London 2012. For example, there are still people writing about Barcelona 1992, Athens 2004 and Beijing 2008. There is now a whole area of research into the impact of mega-events – not just the Olympics, but also World Cups, G20 summits and large pop festivals.

I think there is a great mix in the way that different people approach this sort of research. Quantitative methods are good at looking at aggregate patterns and that is very often where geographer’s start. If a pattern emerges then we know there is a process driving it, but understanding how that process involves going back and understanding individual decision-making. This might involve using qualitative methods such as interviews or focus groups. If you want to understand patterns and processes – two things that are at the heart of geography - you have to be good at handling both quantitative and qualitative data.

And finally, what was your favourite Olympic Games moment?

It has to be Mo Farah winning the 5,000m and 10,000m in London. It shows what dedication and perseverance can achieve. It is not just a case of brute force - he had his tactics and they worked. There was a whole nation behind him and it did not matter what ethnicity or religion anybody was. Everybody was 100% behind him. It is probably the moment that multicultural Britain turned Gold. 

Allan was interviewed in September 2012.

London 2012

The build up to the Olympics in 2012 hosted in London provides an excellent hook to engage Key Stage 3 students with many geographical themes on a range of scales

London 2012 Olympic Park

Written before the London 2012 Olympics, this resource looks at the developments in East London in the lead up to the Games

Geography, Power and the Olympics

Geopolitics is defined as the relationship between power and the spaces of the world. At London 2012 there were 204 such spaces – the nations that competed

Back To Top

• Biophysical Interactions
• Senior Geography Project
• Population Geography
• Kosciuszko Alpine Ecosystem
• Great Barrier Reef
• People and Economic Activity
• Urban Places
• Changing Populations
• Global climate
• Oceans and their coastal margins
• Extreme environments
• Leisure, sport and tourism
• Food and health
• The variety or urban environments
• Changing Urban Systems
• Urban Environmental Stresses
• Sustainable Urban Systems
• Power, places and networks
• Human development and diversity
• Geo Researching Skills
• HSC Geo Skills
• SGP/Internal Assessment Projects
• National Geo Comp
• GTA NSW/ACT Fieldwork Awards
• Latitude Geography authors

London - A case study of the results of the urban dynamics in a large city selected from the developed world

Social structure and spatial patterns of advantage and disadvantage, wealth and poverty, ethnicity.

• Income and poverty
• Education levels, and

• Poverty in London is largely relative poverty, defined by the UK government as being below 60 per cent of median income. 
• High levels of disadvantage in London coexist with some of the greatest concentrations of wealth in Britain.
• Inner London is by far the most deeply divided part of the country, with the highest proportions of both rich and poor people anywhere.
• Over a third of children in Greater London are living in households with incomes below the government’s poverty threshold.
• Income poverty affects one in four of London’s population.
• London now has one of the highest unemployment rates in England, reversing the position which obtained in the 1970s and 1980s when the unemployment rate in London tended to be among the lowest for any region.
• Homelessness is much higher in London than elsewhere in the UK.
• The ethnic dimension of poverty is far more pronounced in London than in other regions.  
• The cost of housing, transport and childcare :
• ​ T he pattern of demand for labour : London’s labour market has changed dramatically over the last twenty years,
• The openness of London’s economy :
• The distribution of earnings :

•   London has the lowest proportion of people born in the UK (72.9 per cent)
•   London has the highest proportion of people from minority ethnic groups apart from more who identified themselves as of Pakistani origin, of whom there is a higher proportion in Yorkshire and the Humber (2.9 per cent) and the West Midlands (2.9 per cent).
•   In 2001 six out of ten Londoners were White British (nearly 4.3 million people) and four out of ten were from ethnic minority groups (nearly 2.9 million people).
•   There were slightly more people who were Asian or Asian British (12 per cent of London’s population) than Black or Black British (11 per cent of London’s population).
• The largest ethnic minority group in London was the Other White group. (These were White people who were not White British or White Irish, and therefore the group includes many other European people). Following the Other White group in size were the Indian, Black African, Black Caribbean and White Irish groups. The Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Other Asian ethnic groups were next.
• Seven of the London boroughs with the highest proportions of ethnic minorities were in Inner London and three in Outer London, whereas nine of the ten boroughs with the lowest proportions of ethnic minorities were in Outer London.
• The borough with the largest proportion of ethnic minorities was Brent where 71 per cent of the population were from ethnic minority groups (including White minorities), followed by Newham, Tower Hamlets, Hackney and Ealing.
• There were nine boroughs in London which had ethnic minority populations which were more than half the borough’s population.
•   In April 2001, the unemployment rate in Greater London was 6.7 per cent – one of the highest rates across England and Wales, second only to that of the North East.
•   London’s regional position is largely driven by high unemployment levels across Inner London boroughs where unemployment rates average 8.9 per cent. Across Outer London, unemployment levels (5.4 per cent) are nearer the national average (5.2 per cent).
•   Across London, borough rates vary from 3.6 per cent in Sutton up to 12.3 per cent in Newham. Rates are also very high in Hackney and Tower Hamlets (both 11.8 per cent).
• While Outer London has low unemployment relative to Inner London, it still has pockets of high unemployment – four per cent of wards in Outer London had rates of 10 per cent and over. 45 per cent of Outer London wards had rates above the national average.
• Unemployment rates are high for young Londoners. Rates among 16-24 year olds are 12.3 per cent – twice as high as rates for those aged 25 and over. Unemployment levels are higher still for those aged 16-19 (22.3 per cent).
• Unemployment rates for BME ( Black and minority ethnic groups) groups across Greater London average 11.3 per cent – more than twice as high as rates for White groups (5.3 per cent). Unemployment levels are highest for Bangladeshi (20.5 per cent) and Black groups (who have an average rate of 14.3 per cent).
•   Women have lower unemployment rates than men across most ethnic groups except for Pakistani women who had higher rates (13.3 per cent) than those of Pakistani men (11.6 per cent). Bangladeshi and Indian women also had rates very close to those of men.
• Those in poor health are more than twice as likely to be unemployed as those in good health (14.1 per cent compared with 5.7 per cent). Unemployment rates for those with poor health are highest in the boroughs of Tower Hamlets (23.3 per cent) and Hackney (21.8 per cent).
• People with no qualifications are almost three times more likely to be unemployed than those with higher level qualifications (11.1 per cent compared with 4.2 per cent). Rates for those with no qualifications are very high across Inner London (17.1 per cent).
•   In terms of their former jobs, unemployed people tended to be over-represented in lower paid occupations and sectors (eg hotels and catering sector, sales and customer service occupations), compared with workers generally.

Changing economic character, nature and location of residential land, commercial and industrial development

•    London was a major city prior to the industrial revolution
•    Early function as a seaport and commercial centre formed a building block for current financial developments
•    Trade generated population growth and profits but also the need for financial service industries, such as insurance and accounting.
• The deregulation of the UK finnance sector is refered to as "the big bang" which allowed massive growth. 
•   Today London continues to be important as one of the three top world cities, exerting economic authority and control
•   Since the 1960-70s manufacturing as been in decline in London. However, highly skilled manufacturing remains in demand.
•   The service sector now dominates London’s economy. Over a third of jobs in London are in the business and finance industry. Other key services are, public sector, law, marketing and advertising, tourism and hospitality, creative and cultural industries.
• Manufacturing does still continue in the London economy

​Culture of place

• Accents from around the world, and in particular the Cockney (east end) accent. (Multi coloured… no longer a white persons city)
• Frequent overcast weather and atmospheric dust  (grey)
• Diesel engines (red buses and black cabs)
• Speaker’s corner in Hyde Park (expansive green spaces)
• Brit pop, club scene and Punk movements
• London is a quite patriotic city with the Union Jack (the combined flags of England, Scotland and Wales) frequently displayed (red white and blue)

• Monday to Friday is about work, while Friday and Saturday are about going out. Sundays include football, newspaper and roast lunch.
• 11 o’clock closing of pubs gives rise to binge drinking culture and late dinners at “curry restaurants”. 
• London is an exhilarating, busy and fast paced city, but also a very expensive one.
• To buy an average home in London requires an average salary of £55,000 (AUS$136,800), however in reality the average salary is only £34,777 (AUS$86,500).
• Key workers are particularly hit as the average school teacher in London earns £26,360, a staff nurse makes £21,950 and a postal worker earns only £21,180. (note: in mid 2006, 1 UK£ = AUS$ 2.49).
• The overall average rent for two-bedroom accommodation for all boroughs is £214. The corresponding average rent for all central boroughs is £321, and for other boroughs £201.
• Only those earning over £60,000 would be considered affluent.
• Most Londoners have a strong pub culture and spend considerable time at the local pub or bar. 
•  The pull of people towards London means it contains much creative energy.
•  London’s constant state of flux makes it a very vibrant and vigorous place in which to live and visit.

Growth, development, future trends and ecological sustainability

• Has a huge demand for natural resources
• Obliterates the natural hydrological system within its area
• Produces waste products, including solid and liquid waste, air pollutants, heat and noise, which alters the environment around it
• Reduces biomass and alters the species of plants and animals in and around it
• Creates new land through reclamation and landfill
• Encouraging households and industry to reduce the amount of resources they consume, such as encouraging energy efficient water heating, and increasing the price of water to discourage its wasteful use.
• Encouraging a reduction in the amount of waste created, such as reducing packaging, using more energy efficient equipment, re-using and recycling materials, educating citizens in more efficient ways of reducing resource use and waste production.
• London is also aiming to reduce transport pressures and hence fuel usage by promoting regional hubs of employment.

Further Reading

• Geographical skills and enquiry
• Human geography
• Physical geography
• Careers Spotlights
• Skills Boosts

Quizzes // 

Urban case study - london.

Test your knowledge of London and urbanisation with this 15-question GCSE quiz.  

If you haven't already done it, work through the urban case study of London on the PowerPoint (especially the graph on page 11). Or look at it again to help fill any gaps in what you know!

Open Resource

HIGH SCORES

Quizzes // urban case study - london, q1. which of these is not a borough of london.

Kingston upon Thames

City of London

Q2. The average UK house price was £272,000 in 2020. What was the average in London?

£272,000

£514,000

£356,000

£790,000

Q3. In the UK, the average salary was £22,044 in 2020. What was the average salary in London?

£22,044

£17,100

£34,473

£50,000

Q4. What causes counter urbanisation in London?

The movement of people out of London due to reasons such as house prices, traffic, crime and pollution

The movement of people into London after the redevelopment of East London for the Olympic Games in 2012

The movement of people from the countryside into the city of London

The movement of people from the centre of London to the suburban boroughs, such as Kingston Upon Thames

Q5. Which of these motorways circles London?

Q6. according to the mayor of london’s office, how many new homes are needed in london each year, q7. social deprivation is where people lack basic services such as housing or employment. approximately how many of london’s population are socially deprived, q8. what is the difference between site and situation.

Situation is the physical characteristics of the location you are studying, whereas site is the location of the place in relation to its physical and human surroundings

Site is the ability to see the physical characteristics of the location whereas situation is a position you may find yourself in

Site relates to the physical characteristics of the location you are studying, whereas situation is the location of the place in relation to its physical and human surroundings

Site refers to the factors that lead to the growth of a town or city, and situation is about the processes involved

Q9. Which of these describes a greenfield site for new housing development in London?

Land that has been used, usually for industry, but is now abandoned and awaiting redevelopment

A ring of protected land around a major town or city preventing further urban sprawl

An area of land that is undeveloped, usually at the edge of a town or city

Any area of the town or countryside which is grassed over, including gardens and parks

Q10. Which of these describes a brownfield site for new housing development in London?

A ring of protected land around a major city preventing further urban sprawl

Q11. Study the population pyramid for London on page 11 of the PowerPoint. Which of the following statements is true?

The most populous age category in London is 25–29

The most populous age category in London is 10–14

The most populous age category in London is 65–69

The most populous age category in London is 30–34

Q12. Study the population pyramid again. Which of the following statements is true?

There are more men aged 65–69 than women

There are more women aged 65–69 than men

There are the same percentages of men and women aged 65–69

There are twice as many men aged 65–69 as women

Q13. Study the population pyramid again. Which of these statements is true?

There are the same number of men and women in London

There are 106,700 more women than men in London

There are 107,500 more men in London than women

There are 107,500 more women in London than men

Q14. When answering a GCSE style question what should you always include?

Place names from a case study or named example

Data such as facts, figures and dates

Ensure you answer the actual question set (for example describe, explain, evaluate)

All of the above

Q15. Parts of East London were redeveloped after the London 2012 Olympics. Which of these was not part of the plan?

New school: Chobham Academy

New housing estate: East Village

International Quarter Business development

Widening of the M25 motorway

You scored this time. The more correct answers you give, and the fewer incorrect answers you guess, the better your score.

Back to Quizzes

View our wide range of webinars

Search webinars

Get in Touch

The Geographical Association 160 Solly Street, Sheffield, S1 4BF

0114 296 0088 [email protected]

Stay Social

Cookies Privacy Terms Sitemap

© 2020 The Geographical Association. Charity no. 1135148. Company no. 07139068. Website by QWeb Ltd

AQA GCSE Geography

Urbanisation in the UK: London Case Study

London is the capital city of the United Kingdom and stands as one of the world’s dominant economic hubs. Since the late 18th century, it has experienced rapid growth in size and population, driven by increasing rates of urbanisation.

Location and Importance of London

• London’s population is 8.9 million, making it the largest city in the UK.
• Many people commute to London for work due to the abundance of employment opportunities.
• Numerous Trans National Corporations (TNCs) have their headquarters in London.
• The city has over forty universities, alongside numerous research centres and specialist colleges, offering diverse educational opportunities.
• London generates 22% of the UK’s GDP, despite having just 12.5% of its population.
• Situated on the River Thames in southeast England, the City of London covers 1.1 square miles. The metropolitan area, Greater London , extends up to 45 miles from the centre.
• High living costs in London reflect its economic status, with everyday goods, services, and housing prices above the national average.
• Recognised as a ‘world city’, London is a key financial centre alongside New York City and Tokyo.
• The city is well connected with several major train stations and airports in and around the city.
• London is a hub for fashion, technology, entertainment and culture.

Migration Impact

London’s global influence and wealth make it an attractive destination for migrants from both within the UK and abroad. The city is one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world, largely due to its history of migration throughout the 20th and 21st centuries.

Some notable examples of large-scale migration include:

Many of these groups first migrated to London, or aspired to due to its urbanisation, modernity and wealth.

London’s population structure

Due to migration, the city has dramatically changed in a variety of ways .

Each group of migrants brings their own culture, religions, traditions, communities and food to the area. Over time, this changes whole areas of the city. Since 1991, immigration has consistently increased, influenced by factors like war, disease, genocides and political instability. However, this has led to increasing population density in and around London. 

London is experiencing natural increase due to its younger average population.

• Younger adults in the UK move to the city for economic opportunities and the social aspect of life there.
• Migrants from overseas tend to be younger, willing to make a big change and excited for the potential that London holds.

Both of these factors contribute to London having a distinctive demographic structure.

According to the 2021 census, 41% of London’s residents were not born in the city. In 2011, it was officially noted that White British people were no longer the majority.

Older individuals often move out of London for retirement or quieter living, skewing the population towards a younger demographic.

Urban Change: Opportunities and Challenges

As the culture of London evolves, it brings many opportunities for the city’s residents, but this evolution is also accompanied by its own set of distinct challenges.

Urban Growth Impact on the Environment

Big cities often cause environmental issues , and London is no exception.

Air pollution

In 1952, London experienced The Great Smog, a severe air pollution event resulting from coal burning. Since then, the city has implemented measures to combat air pollution but still faces significant challenges in this area. London’s air pollution levels are higher than those of many European cities, with harmful nitrogen dioxide emissions primarily from road vehicles. Due to this, it’s estimated that 4,000 people die annually in London due to air pollution exposure.

Road vehicles are a primary cause of pollution, as millions of cars travel through London every week, mainly for commuting to work. The city’s dense road network was not designed for such heavy automobile traffic, which compounds the problem. This makes London’s air particularly harmful to breathe.

The City of London has established ‘low emission zones’ to discourage driving by imposing a daily fee. Recent studies show that this measure has reduced nitrogen oxides by 35% and carbon dioxide emissions by 6%. The current mayor of London (as of 2023) wants to expand these zones, as London still does not meet the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guidelines.

Waste management

London generates a large amount of waste, approximately 18 million metric tonnes annually. Unfortunately, most waste ends up in landfills or is incinerated, both harmful to the environment. Only 32% of London’s waste is recycled, which is the lowest rate in the country. However, the government aims to increase this to 65% by 2030.

If London continues to rely on incineration, efforts to reduce carbon emissions from waste burning will be wasted.

Inner city dereliction

London houses many abandoned industrial (brownfield) sites as production has moved out of the city and country. These sites present both development opportunities and challenges, including environmental cleanup and high development costs. Also, the homes end up being extremely expensive. Without development, these brownfield sites can present environmental and safety hazards.

The city faces a housing shortage, pressuring the government and developers to construct affordable housing, in large quantities. Developing on greenfield sites is often cheaper but leads to issues like wildlife destruction and increased traffic in those areas.

London is known as a ‘green city’, with green spaces making up 47% of the city’s area. Creating and preserving green spaces within the city is vital for environmental health and the wellbeing of residents.

The city’s 8 million trees oxygenate the air and absorb carbon dioxide, helping to mitigate pollution. London’s diverse ecosystems support 13,000 wildlife species in parks, cemeteries, and woodlands.

Parks provide an escape from urban life, where Londoners engage in sports, relaxation, and socialising. Also, with 30,000 allotments available for rent, residents can grow their own fruits and vegetables.

Urban Change Impact

The urban transformation of London over the past two centuries reflects its evolving role from an industrial hub to a modern economic centre.

Here are some of the impacts that the constant urban change has brought to Inner City London and Metropolitan London:

Hi there! Want to study 2x more effectively?

Sign up now for exclusive access to interactive quizzes, audio lessons and more educational tools..

Sign me up!

• Revision Notes
• Unlimited Quizzes
• Audio Content
• Progress Tracking
• No Advertisements

Last updated: December 27, 2022

Please read these terms and conditions carefully before using our services.

Definitions

For these Terms and Conditions:

• Affiliate means an entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with a party, where “control” means ownership of 50% or more of the shares, equity interest or other securities entitled to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority.
• Account means a unique account created for you to access our services or some of our services.
• Country refers to the United Kingdom
• Company refers to Shalom Education Ltd, 86 London Road, (Kingsland Church), Colchester, Essex, CO3 9DW, and may be referred to as ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’, or ‘Shalom Education’ in this agreement.
• Device means any device that can access the Service, such as a computer, a mobile phone or a digital tablet.
• Feedback means feedback, innovations or suggestions sent by You regarding the attributes, performance or features of our service.
• Free Trial refers to a limited period of time that may be free when purchasing a subscription.
• Orders mean a request by you to purchase services from us.
• Promotions refer to contests, sweepstakes or other promotions offered by us through the website.
• Services refer to our website, resources and tutoring service.
• Subscriptions refer to the services or access to the service offered on a subscription basis by the company to you.
• Terms and Conditions (also referred to as “Terms”) mean these Terms and Conditions that form the entire agreement between you and Shalom Education Ltd regarding the use of the services we offer.
• Third-party Social Media Service means any services or content (including data, information, products or services) provided by a third party that may be displayed, included or made available on the website.
• Website refers to Shalom-education.com, accessible from  https://www.shalom-education.com
• You means the individual accessing or using our services, or the company, or other legal entity on behalf of which such individual is accessing or using our services.
• Tutor refers to an individual who teaches a single pupil or a small group of students who have registered with Shalom Education Ltd.
• Tutee refers to a student or a pupil who has registered for tutoring with Shalom Education Ltd, which is administered through our tutoring platform.

Acknowledgement

Thank you for choosing Shalom Education Tuition for your educational needs. These terms and conditions outline the rules and regulations for the use of our services, and the agreement that will govern your relationship with us.

By accessing or using our services, you accept and agree to be bound by these terms and conditions, and our  privacy policy , which describes our policies and procedures for the collection, use, and disclosure of your personal information when you use our website.

It is important that you read both documents carefully before using our services, as they outline your rights and obligations as a user of our services. If you do not agree to these terms and conditions or our privacy policy, please do not use our services. We hope you have a positive and educational experience with Shalom Education Tuition.

Signing up for Tutoring or Membership Accounts

By signing up for tutoring or membership accounts through the website, you confirm that you have the legal ability to enter into a binding contract.

Your information

When you place an order, we may ask you to provide certain information, such as your name, email, phone number, credit card details, and billing address.

You confirm that you have the right to use the payment method you choose, and that the information you provide is accurate and complete. By submitting your information, you give us permission to share it with payment processing third parties to complete your order.

Order cancellation

We reserve the right to cancel your order at any time for various reasons, including but not limited to:

• Unavailability of services (e.g. no tutors available)
• Errors in the description or prices of services
• Errors in your order
• Suspected fraud or illegal activity

Cancelling your order

Any services that you purchase can only be returned in accordance with these terms and conditions. Our Returns Policy forms a part of these Terms and Conditions.

In general, you have the right to cancel your order and receive a full refund within 14 days of placing it. However, you cannot cancel an order for services that are made to your specifications or are clearly personalised, or for services that you have already received in part.

Money-Back Guarantee: If you are not satisfied with the quality of your tutoring session, you may be eligible for a full or partial refund or credit. To request a refund or credit, please contact us within 24 hours after the end of the session and provide a detailed explanation of your dissatisfaction. We will review your request and, if approved, will issue a refund or credit to your account.

• Please note that refunds or credits may not be available for all types of tutoring services and may be subject to fees or other charges. For more information, please contact us.

Errors and inaccuracies

We strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information about the service we offer, but we cannot guarantee that everything will be completely accurate and up-to-date at all times. Prices, product images, descriptions, availability, and services may be inaccurate, incomplete, or out of date.

We reserve the right to change or update any information, and to correct errors, inaccuracies, or omissions at any time without prior notice.

Prices policy

We reserve the right to change our prices at any time before accepting your order.

All tutoring services and membership accounts purchased on our website must be paid for in full at the time of purchase, for the required time of use. We accept a variety of payment methods, including credit cards, debit cards, and online payment services like PayPal.

Your payment card may be subject to validation checks and authorisation by your card issuer. If we do not receive the necessary authorisation, we cannot be held responsible for any delays or failure to deliver your order.

Subscriptions

Subscription period.

Our tutoring services are available with a pay-as-you-go option or a subscription option that is billed on a monthly or annual basis. The tutoring account subscription will end at the end of the period. You can choose the subscription option that best suits your needs and cancel at any time.

Our membership accounts are billed monthly or annually and do not automatically renew after the period. You can choose to renew your membership account at the end of the period if you wish to continue your membership.

Subscription cancellations

You can cancel your subscription renewal through your account settings or by contacting us. Please note that you will not receive a refund for fees you have already paid for your current subscription period, and you will be able to access the service until the end of your current subscription period.

We need accurate and complete billing information from you, including your full name, address, postal code, telephone number, and valid payment method. If automatic billing fails, you will not receive tutoring services until a payment is made. If payment is not made within a reasonable time period, your account may be terminated.

Fee changes

We reserve the right to modify the subscription fees at any time. Any change in fees will take effect at the end of your current subscription period.

We will give you reasonable notice of any fee changes so you have the opportunity to cancel your subscription before the changes take effect. If you continue to use the service after the fee change, you agree to pay the modified amount.

In general, paid subscription fees are non-refundable. However, we may consider certain refund requests on a case-by-case basis and grant them at our discretion.

We may offer free trials of our subscriptions at our discretion. You may be asked to provide billing information to sign up for a free trial. If you do provide billing information, you will not be charged until the free trial period ends.

On the last day of the free trial, unless you have cancelled your subscription, you will be automatically charged the applicable subscription fees for the plan you have chosen. We reserve the right to modify or cancel free trial offers at any time without notice.

From time to time, we may offer promotions through the Service, such as discounts, special offers, or contests. These promotions may be governed by separate rules and regulations.

If you choose to participate in a promotion, please review the applicable rules and our privacy policy carefully. In the event of a conflict between the promotion rules and these terms and conditions, the promotion rules will take precedence.

Please note that any promotion may be modified or discontinued at any time, and we reserve the right to disqualify any participant who violates the rules or engages in fraudulent or dishonest behaviour. By participating in a promotion, you agree to be bound by the applicable rules and our decisions, which are final and binding in all matters related to the promotion.

User Accounts

In order to access certain features of our services, you may be required to create an account. When you create an account, you agree to provide accurate, complete, and current information about yourself as prompted by the account registration process. If you provide any false, inaccurate, outdated, or incomplete information, or if we have reasonable grounds to suspect that you have done so, we reserve the right to suspend or terminate your account.

You are solely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your account and password, and you agree to accept responsibility for all activities that occur under your account. If you believe that your account has been compromised or that there has been any unauthorised access to it, you must notify us immediately.

You may not use a username that is already in use by another user, that belongs to another person or entity without appropriate authorisation, or that is offensive, vulgar, or obscene. We reserve the right to remove or reclaim any username that we determine, in our sole discretion, to be inappropriate, infringing, or otherwise in violation of these terms and conditions.

Tutor Agreements

As a tutor working with Shalom Education, you agree to the following terms and conditions:

Tutor relationships

• You are at least eighteen years of age and have the necessary qualifications and/or experience to provide tuition in the subjects specified on your CV.
• You will not make any agreements with a tutee, any member of the tutee’s family, or the tutee’s guardian that are intended to circumvent the relationship between our service and the tutee and to benefit you at our expense. This includes the exchange of private information (e.g. phone numbers, emails or social media accounts etc).
• You will not, during the period of any tutoring session with a tutee and for a period of six months from the conclusion of the last tutoring session, give any tuition services to that tutee.
• You will use our platform as your only means of communication with tutees, and any other methods are strictly prohibited.
• You will not be abusive towards a tutee or their nominee on our website or any other place.
• You are expected to maintain a professional and respectful relationship with tutees at all times.
• You will not engage in any inappropriate or illegal behaviour while working with tutees, including but not limited to harassment or discrimination.
• You are expected to follow all applicable laws and regulations while providing tutoring services.

Tutor responsibilities

• You will not complete any coursework, essays, or other assignments on behalf of the tutee. However, you can offer support.
• You will be punctual and communicate with us if you are running late or need to reschedule a lesson.
• You are expected to provide high-quality tutoring services to tutees, including preparing appropriate lesson plans.
• You will be responsible for ensuring that you have the necessary resources and equipment to provide effective tutoring services, such as a reliable internet connection and computer if tutoring online.
• You will be expected to keep confidential any personal or sensitive information that you may learn about a tutee while working with them.

Tutor compensation

• You will not request or accept any payments from a tutee, or their nominee.
• The company reserves the right to withhold payment to tutors if it believes lessons are being booked outside our platform.
• The company will pay you a fee for your tutoring services according to the rates agreed between you and the company.
• The company will be responsible for collecting payment from the tutee.
• If you are self-employed, we expect you to provide us with your UTR number and you are expected to pay your own tax to HMRC

Tutor termination

• As a tutor working with the company, you may terminate your relationship with a tutee at any time by providing reasonable notice.
• The company may also terminate your relationship with a tutee at any time, for any reason, such as if the tutee is no longer in need of tutoring services or if the tutee expresses dissatisfaction with your services.
• The company may terminate your use of its service if you breach any of the terms and conditions outlined in this agreement.
• The company may also terminate your use of its service if it determines that you are no longer fit to provide tutoring services or if it receives multiple complaints about your performance.

Tutee Agreements

As a tutee using our service, you agree to the following terms and conditions:

• If you are under 18 years of age, you must have consent from a parent or guardian to register and that parent/guardian must enter into an agreement with Shalom Education to provide tuition services.
• You must contact a tutor through the Shalom Education tutoring platform. Any other means of communication is prohibited.
• You agree not to publish any abusive comments about a tutor or another tutee on the Shalom Education website or any other place. This includes defamatory or derogatory comments.
• You must not request a tutor to complete your coursework, essays, or other assignments given to you in your various schools but can request for support towards that.
• You agree not to make any agreement or arrangement with a tutor which is intended to circumvent the relationship between Shalom Education and the Tutor.

Expectations

• Lessons will be held at the frequency and duration agreed upon with us.
• Shalom Education will provide any necessary materials or resources for the lessons.
• You are expected to be punctual for lessons and to provide adequate notice for cancellations or rescheduling.
• You are expected to provide any necessary materials or resources for the lessons (e.g. pens, pencils or a protractor).

Responsibilities

• If you cancel a lesson less than 12 hours before the lesson is due to commence, you may be charged a cancellation fee of 50% of the lesson fee. If you cancel a lesson less than 2 hours before the scheduled start time of a lesson, you will be charged the full lesson fee.

Dispute Resolution

• If you have any concerns or issues with your tutoring experience, please contact us at [email protected] as soon as possible. We will work with you and your tutor to try to resolve any disputes or issues in a fair and reasonable manner.

Termination

• You may terminate your lessons with a tutor at any time by providing reasonable notice, as specified in your contract with us.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and understand this agreement and agree to be bound by its terms. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Copyright Policy

We respect the intellectual property rights of others and expect our users to do the same. It is our policy to respond to any claim that content posted on our service infringes the copyright or other intellectual property rights of any person.

If you are a copyright owner or authorised on behalf of one and you believe that your copyrighted work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our copyright agent with the following information:

• An electronic or physical signature of the person authorised to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright’s interests.
• A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed, including the URL (web page address) of the location where the copyrighted work exists or a copy of the copyrighted work.
• Identification of the URL or other specific location on our service where the material that you claim is infringing is located.
• Your address, telephone number, and email address.
• A statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
• A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or are authorised to act on the copyright owner’s behalf.

You may be held accountable for damages (including costs and attorneys’ fees) for misrepresenting that any content is infringing your copyright.

Upon receipt of a notification, we will take whatever action, in our sole discretion, we deem appropriate, including removal of the challenged content from our service. If you believe that your content has been removed in error, please contact us at  [email protected] .

Intellectual Property

The original content on our services (excluding content provided by you or other users), features, and functionality are and will remain the exclusive property of Shalom Education Ltd and its licensors. This includes, but is not limited to, text, graphics, images, logos, software, and other materials on our website and any proprietary technology used in the operation of our services.

Our service is protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws of both the United Kingdom and foreign countries. Our trademarks and trade dress may not be used in connection with any product or service without the prior written consent of Shalom Education Ltd. All other trademarks not owned by Shalom Education Ltd that appear on our service are the property of their respective owners.

By using our service, you acknowledge and agree that any intellectual property rights, including copyrights, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets, in the content and materials provided by Shalom Education Ltd or accessed through our service are the sole property of Shalom Education Ltd or the respective owners of such rights. You agree not to use, reproduce, modify, distribute, or create derivative works of such content and materials without the express written permission of Shalom Education Ltd or the respective owners of such rights.

You are responsible for protecting your own intellectual property rights and for obtaining any necessary licenses or permissions from the owners of any third-party intellectual property that you may use in connection with your use of our service. Shalom Education Ltd will not be liable for any claims or damages arising from your use of intellectual property that infringes the rights of others.

If you believe that your intellectual property rights have been violated on our service, please contact us at  [email protected] .

Your Feedback to Us

By submitting any feedback or suggestions to the company, you agree to assign to the company all rights, titles, and interests in such feedback or suggestions. If for any reason such assignment is ineffective, you agree to grant the company a non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide right and license to use, reproduce, disclose, sublicense, distribute, modify, and exploit such feedback or suggestions without restriction.

You acknowledge that the company may use your feedback or suggestions for any purpose, including to improve the company’s products or services, and that the company is under no obligation to compensate you for your feedback or suggestions.

Links to Other Websites

Our Service may contain links to third-party websites or services that are not owned or controlled by Shalom Education Ltd. These links are provided for your convenience only and do not imply endorsement by our business of the linked website or service. We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third-party websites or services.

By using our Service, you acknowledge and agree that the use of any third-party websites or services is at your own risk. Shalom Education Ltd does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy or reliability of any content or materials on third-party websites or services, and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions.

In no event will Shalom Education Ltd be liable for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services available on or through any third-party websites or services. This limitation of liability applies to all claims.

We recommend that you carefully read the terms and conditions and privacy policies of any third-party websites or services that you visit, as they may differ from the terms and policies of our own services. If you have any concerns or questions about a third-party website or service linked from our service, we encourage you to contact the site or service directly for more information.

Shalom Education Ltd reserves the right to terminate or suspend your account at any time, without prior notice or liability, for any reason whatsoever, including but not limited to breach of these terms and conditions, fraudulent or illegal activity, or any other conduct that we deem inappropriate or harmful to our business or other users.

Upon termination, your right to use our services will immediately cease, and any outstanding balances or fees owed to Shalom Education Ltd must be paid in full. If you wish to terminate your account, you may simply stop using our services and contact us to request the closure of your account.

Any personal information or user-generated content associated with your account will be retained in accordance with our privacy policy, unless otherwise required by law.

You acknowledge and agree that Shalom Education Ltd will not be liable to you or any third party for any termination of your access to our services. You further agree that any rights or obligations that survive the termination of your account, such as indemnification or confidentiality obligations, will remain in effect.

“AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” Disclaimer

The service is provided to you “As is” and “As available” and with all faults and defects without warranty of any kind. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our services, we cannot guarantee that they will be error-free or uninterrupted.

To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, our business and its affiliates and licensors and service providers disclaim all warranties, expressed or implied, including but not limited to warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. We do not make any representations or warranties that our services will meet your requirements, achieve any intended results, be compatible with any other software or services, operate without interruption, or be error-free.

We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or timeliness of the information, content, or materials provided through our services.

We do not guarantee that our services or any content or materials provided through our services will be free from viruses, malware, or other harmful components. It is your responsibility to protect your device and system from such threats, and we recommend that you use appropriate security measures and virus protection software.

Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of certain types of warranties or limitations on the applicable statutory rights of a consumer, so some or all of the above exclusions and limitations may not apply to you. In such cases, the exclusions and limitations set forth in this section shall be applied to the greatest extent enforceable under applicable law.

By using our services, you acknowledge and agree that your use is at your own risk, and that you are solely responsible for any damage or loss that may result from your use of our services.

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

These terms and your use of the service shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the country, excluding its conflicts of law rules. Any disputes arising out of or in connection with these terms or the use of the service shall be resolved through the courts of the country and you hereby consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts.

Disputes Resolution

If you have any concerns or disputes related to the service, you agree to try to resolve the issue informally by contacting us first.

You can try contacting the company through email ([email protected]) or by phone (01206657616) to see if we can come to an agreement or find a solution to your issue. This can be a quick and effective way to address any concerns or issues you may have, without the need for formal legal proceedings.

We will make every effort to address your concerns and reach a mutually satisfactory resolution. If we are unable to resolve the dispute informally, you may choose to bring the matter to alternative dispute resolution through a mediator or arbitrator. Any such alternative dispute resolution proceedings will be conducted in accordance with the laws of the country and will be confidential. You agree that any such dispute will be resolved on an individual basis and that class or collective actions are not permitted.

Severability and Waiver

Severability.

If any provision of these terms and conditions is found to be invalid or unenforceable, that provision will be enforced to the maximum extent possible, and the remaining provisions will remain in full force and effect.

The failure to exercise a right or to require the performance of an obligation under these terms and conditions shall not affect a party’s ability to exercise such right or require such performance at any time in the future. Similarly, the waiver of a breach of these terms and conditions shall not constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach.

Changes to These Terms and Conditions

We may update or change these terms and conditions at any time, at our sole discretion. If we make a material change to these terms, we will provide reasonable notice, such as by posting a notification on our website or through email, at least 30 days before the change takes effect. It is your responsibility to regularly check these terms and conditions for any updates or changes.

By continuing to access or use our Service after any updates or changes to these terms, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not agree to the updated or changed terms, in whole or in part, please stop using the website and our services.

If you have any questions about these terms and conditions, You can contact us:

• By email: [email protected]
• By visiting this page on our website: https://www.shalom-education.com/contact-us
• By phone number: 01206657616
• Tutor refers to an individual that teaches a single pupil or a small group of students which have registered with Shalom Education Ltd.
• Tutee refers to a student or a pupil that has registered for tutoring with Shalom Education Ltd, which is administered through our tutoring platform.

When you place an order, we may ask you to provide certain information, such as your name, email, phone number, credit card details and billing address.

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

• 0 Shopping Cart

Shoreditch London Case Study

Shoreditch is an example of how urban change has created a cultural mix, recreation, and entertainment opportunities. This is one of a collection of four case studies covering social, economic and environmental opportunities resulting from urban change in London .

Case Study – Shoreditch, London

Shoreditch is a district in the East End of London, close to the city centre. It is typical of the sort of changes that have happened around London and other UK cities.

Shoreditch was once a run-down inner-city area, with ageing factories and warehouses that had ceased operations, prompting people to leave the vicinity. In their place, many Bangladeshi immigrants moved in, particularly around Brick Lane.

Brick Lane in Shoreditch, London

Today, the area has a diverse ethnic population.

What is the cultural mix found in Shoreditch?

Shoreditch boasts a diverse cultural blend and is almost unrecognisable from three decades ago. The old industrial structures have transformed into residential flats and office spaces. Additionally, pubs and bars have been revamped and repurposed into restaurants and art galleries. New job opportunities have emerged in creative industries, such as web design, filmmaking, and art, with a concentration around the Old Street roundabout. The rapid influx of hi-tech companies has earned the area the moniker “Silicon Roundabout,” reminiscent of Silicon Valley, California’s tech industry hub where numerous tech giants blossomed. Facebook, Google, and Microsoft have all channelled investments into the Silicon Roundabout region.

New, hi-tech companies around Old Street roundabout, nicknamed ‘Silicon Roundabout’

What are the opportunities for recreation and entertainment in Shoreditch?

Gentrification has caused a shift in the population of Shoreditch, with older residents and Bangladeshi families leaving due to increasing rents and property prices. In their place, young professionals in industries such as finance and the arts have moved in, changing the neighbourhood’s demographics.

This transformation has brought about a surge in new recreational and entertainment options, making Shoreditch one of London’s liveliest areas. During the day, the bustling cafes cater to the younger crowd, while at night, the clubs and bars enliven the streets. The walls are adorned with graffiti and artwork, which attracts many visitors.

In the mid-2000s, the Spitalfields market site was redeveloped. The new development , known as Spitalfields, is open every day of the week. The popular shopping area hosts various retail brands, street-food stalls, bars and restaurants, and independent traders showcasing handcrafted goods, artwork, fashion, and jewellery. It also hosts public art and events programmes.

Spitalfields Market, Shoreditch

Recreation and Entertainment in Shoreditch

Premium Resources

Please support internet geography.

If you've found the resources on this page useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Related Topics

Use the images below to explore related GeoTopics.

How has urban change created opportunities in London?

Topic home, london docklands case study, share this:.

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)

If you've found the resources on this site useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Search Internet Geography

Top posts and pages.

Latest Blog Entries

Pin It on Pinterest

• Click to share
• Print Friendly