The Fossil Encased in "Case In Point"

Lana Del Rey isn't just captivating to the legions of fans who worship her; she's also beloved by her celebrity peers. Case and point: the singer was recently interviewed by a handful of other icons for the debut U.S. issue of L'Officiel including Kim Kardashian, Stevie Nicks, Courtney Love, Grimes, … and more. — W , 7 Feb. 2018 Waste Management CEO Jim Fish on CNBC Friday disputed the narrative that major companies are using most of the new corporate tax cut to buy back stock. Fish cited the trash and recycling giant's plans as case and point, saying the company he leads is giving special bonuses of $2,000 to about 34,000 employees. — CNBC.com , 16 Feb. 2018

Given that case can refer to something that serves as an example and point commonly refers to an idea that you try to make other people accept or understand, one could argue that "case and point" is an acceptable phrase that suggests you have provided an example to prove an assertion. However, the correct phrase, attested by centuries of use, is " case in point ."

alt 5adf93a49b0b2

"Case and point" is an eggcorn and may raise your reader's eyebrow.

The idiom "case in point" dates to the 1600s and refers to an instance or example that supports, or is relevant or pertinent to, what is being discussed. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the phrase began as a legal term to refer to a judicial precedent to be followed by a judge when deciding a later similar case.

The case therefore before us seems to be what they call a "case in point"; the relation between the child and father, being what comes nearest to that between a creature and its creator. — The Spectator , 27 Sept. 1711

The "in point" element of the phrase was in use prior to describe people or things ready for action or in proper condition.

My son in point is for to lete / The holy laws of oure Alkaron. — Geoffrey Chaucer, Man of Law's Tale , circa 1387

"In point" likely originated from Anglo-Norman en point and French en bon point , and it was often used with modifying words specifying a type of condition, state, or situation—for example, a person might be "in good point" or "in a better point." (Such constructions were in keeping with the roots of point : French en bon point means "in good condition.")

Ballet dancers will know en pointe to be a term used to describe a position in which the body is balanced on the tips of the toes. That French phrase was anglicized as "on point" in the 20th century. Another 20th-century sense of "on point" refers to something relevant to the matter at hand. That sense was originally used in legal contexts but, today, is more often encountered as a general term of approval.

She wasn't just on point, she was magnificently on point, singing with a disarming vulnerability and, ultimately, a power that left my jaw on the freakin' floor. — Charlie Mason, TVLine.com , 23 Apr. 2018 She was stunning in a black dress, littered with sparkles and her signature black eyeliner was on point as she walked from the platform to the main stage with confidence. — Kelli Skye Fadroski, The Orange County Register , 6 Aug. 2016

Use of "on point" in law developed from the earlier use of "in point" to describe things being appropriate or pertinent to a situation (as in "the Bible quotation was in point to the topic being discussed"). "In point" is occasionally summoned as a synonym of "on point" in its legal sense, but it is chiefly found in the phrase "case in point." Hence, we can consider "in point" to be a fossil preserved mainly in this one set phrase. With that in mind, remember to use "in point" when writing or speaking of a "case in point" to help ensure that it stays encased in its English language amber a while longer.

Word of the Day

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Games & Quizzes

Play Quordle: Guess all four words in a limited number of tries.  Each of your guesses must be a real 5-letter word.

Science & Nature

'tis the (flu) season: the history of ‘influenza’, a cast of 12 astrological words, 9 superb owl words, the many origin stories of 'nerd', 12 pairs of commonly confused animal words, great big list of beautiful and useless words, vol. 3, even more words that sound like insults but aren't, the words of the week - feb. 23, 10 scrabble words without any vowels, grammar & usage, words commonly mispronounced, more commonly misspelled words, is 'irregardless' a real word, 8 grammar terms you used to know, but forgot, homophones, homographs, and homonyms.

bottom_desktop desktop:[300x250]

  • Daily Crossword
  • Word Puzzle
  • Word Finder
  • Word of the Day
  • Synonym of the Day
  • Word of the Year
  • Language stories
  • All featured
  • Gender and sexuality
  • All pop culture
  • Grammar Coach ™
  • Writing hub
  • Grammar essentials
  • Commonly confused
  • All writing tips
  • Pop culture
  • Writing tips
  • case in point

A relevant example or illustration of something, as in A case in point was the collision of a cyclist with a pedestrian crossing the designated bike path . [Mid-1700s]

Words Nearby case in point

  • case history
  • casein glue

The American Heritage® Idioms Dictionary Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

case in point usage

‘Case in Point' or 'Case and Point': What's the Difference?

case in point usage

Are you wondering whether to use ‘case in point’ or ‘case and point’? What’s the difference? And which is actually correct? We’ll cover that in this article, plus teach you how to use the correct phrase in a sentence.

Don’t feel like skimming? Here’s the short answer.

'Case in point' is the correct way to write the phrase. 'Case and point' is how it's commonly misspelled. Therefore, you should avoid using that spelling of the phrase in your writing.

‘Case in Point’ or ‘Case and Point’ – What’s the Difference?

The difference between these two is that ‘case in point’ is correct, and ‘case and point’ isn’t. Never use the latter in your writing.

Is the Correct Phrase ‘Case in Point’ or ‘Case and Point’?

Since you know the difference between these two phrases, you know that ‘case in point’ is the only correct way to say this phrase.

Definition and Meaning

Let’s break down what ‘case in point’ means. Well, we’ve got ‘in point,’ which is a pretty old phrase. It’s something called a fossil phrase, which is only found in an idiom and never really used on its own. ‘In point’ typically means something relevant or something important.

‘Case’ can refer to something that serves as an example, and ‘point’ refers to an idea that you try to make people understand or accept.

Therefore, the meaning of ‘case in point’ is: “an instance or example that supports, or is relevant or pertinent to, what is being discussed.”

The official Merriam-Webster definition is: “an illustrative, relevant, or pertinent case.”

How to Use the Phrase in a Sentence

Now that you know what the idiom means, let’s see how to use it in a sentence correctly.

  • I knew we’d blow y’all out of the water. Last week’s game was a case in point.
  • She said you were mean. The fact you left me without a ride is a case in point.
  • The way you dress says a lot about your personality. Todd’s a slob. Case in point.
  • I’m better at basketball than you. I win every time—case in point.
  • I’m a stellar student. My grades are a case in point.
  • My niece is a great driver. Her clean driving record is a case in point.

A Brief History

The term ‘case in point’ originates from the French term à point , which means something relevant to the point and dates all the way back to 1647. It was taken from the Anglo-Norman phrase en point , meaning the state or condition of something. It was used to refer to the examples of legal cases presented in the courts.

Concluding Thoughts on ‘Case in Point’ and ‘Case and Point’

Now that you know what ‘case in point’ means and the correct way to say (and write) the phrase, you can use the above examples to create your own sentences.

We’ve got a whole library of content dedicated to helping you understand the most common confusing words and phrases in the English language.

Learn More:

  • ‘Incase' or 'In Case': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • ‘In Regard To' or 'In regards To': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • 'Wellbeing' or 'Well-Being': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • ‘Ms' vs 'Mrs.': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • ‘Compare to' vs 'Compare With': What's the Difference?
  • ‘Margarita’ or ‘Margherita’: How to Spell ‘Margarita’ Correctly
  • ‘Wheelbarrel’ or ‘Wheelbarrow’: How to Spell It Correctly
  • ‘Year Old' or 'Years Old': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • 'Email' or 'E-mail': What's the Difference?
  • 'Valentines Day' or 'Valentine's Day': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • 'To Much' or 'Too Much': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • ‘Buck Naked' or 'Butt Naked': Which Is It? Is There a Difference?
  • ‘Emigrate' vs 'Immigrate': What's the Difference?
  • 'Nowadays' or 'Now A Days': What's the Difference Between the Two?
  • 'Photo Shoot' or 'Photoshoot': What's the Difference Between the Two?

We encourage you to share this article on Twitter and Facebook . Just click those two links - you'll see why.

It's important to share the news to spread the truth. Most people won't.

Add new comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Post Comment

case in point usage

Writing Explained

What Does Case in Point Mean?

Home » Phrase and Idiom Dictionary » What Does Case in Point Mean?

Case in Point Meaning

Definition: A relevant example of something.

Origin of Case in Point

This expression originally was shorter; it was simply in point . It comes from the French expression a pointe . The French meaning was something relevant and to the point.

Case is sometimes used in a similar way to for example , and over time people started saying case in point instead of just in point .

In point originated in English around the year 1658, and case in point came a little later, in the 1700s. Another related idiom is in point of fact .

A common error is to structure this phrase case and point . The correct formulation is case in point .

Examples of Case in Point

case in point usage

Kira: I totally disagree. Sequels are almost always terrible, and they are never better than the original film.

Dan: That’s not true. Case in point: The Godfather, Part 2.

Kira: I’ve never seen it, so that doesn’t count.

Dan: Then we’ll watch it together.

The following example involves two women talking about whether or not athletes should enter other fields such as acting or politics.

case in point or case and point meaning

Ruby: But sometimes they can be very popular in those fields.

Gertrude: Like who? Give me one example.

Ruby: A case in point is Arnold Schwarzenegger. He was a bodybuilder, then a very popular actor, and then a governor.

More Examples

This excerpt is about a political advisor who used a term that many people avoid. This is because many people use this term when making hate speech about Jewish people.

Subtlety is not Steve Bannon’s strong suit.

  • Case in point, the senior adviser to President Donald Trump, who rarely speaks publicly, decided this would be a good week to use a term known as an anti-Semitic dog whistle. – Chicago Tribune

This example is from an article about an actress. After saying that she makes all movies better, the author gives an example to prove his point.

  • Carla Gugino is an actress who makes everything she’s in better. The latest case in point: “Wolves,” a coming-of-age movie out on Friday in which she plays a New York City wife and mom. – New York Daily News

Case in point is an example that illustrates a point or proves or supports an argument.

Two Minute English

‘case in point’ or ‘case and point’: dissecting the idiomatic mystery.

Marcus Froland

January 21, 2024

Have you ever found yourself in a debate and struggled to remember if the phrase you wanted to use was “case in point” or “case and point”? Such dilemmas can be all too common with idiomatic expressions , but when it comes to language precision , knowing the correct expression can make a world of difference. This article will explore the differences between these two phrases, the origins and correct usage of the widely accepted “case in point”, and how to avoid the common misconception of “case and point.” With this knowledge, you’ll be able to strengthen your communication skills and professional credibility .

Introduction to Idiomatic Expressions in American English

Idiomatic expressions are an essential part of American English, adding relatability and color to writing. These phrases often convey a specific meaning or sentiment that can be difficult to translate literally, making their correct usage critical in both professional and informal communication.

When used correctly, idioms play a significant role in professional correspondence , signaling familiarity and approachability while also reflecting well on your language skills. To optimize your communication, it’s essential to grasp the nuances of American English idioms and ensure your understanding and implementation are accurate.

In this section, we’ll explore the importance of idiomatic expressions in American English, focusing on their impact on professional correspondence and writing color . We’ll discuss how the proper use of idioms can enhance your credibility and strengthen your persuasiveness in various contexts.

“You can’t judge a book by its cover.”

Take, for example, the idiom above. It conveys the message that appearances can be deceiving, and one should not form an opinion solely based on superficial qualities. Idioms like this add depth and resonance to your writing, allowing you to express complex ideas with ease and precision.

However, employing idiomatic expressions can be a double-edged sword. When misunderstood or misused, they can create confusion or even damage your credibility . With this in mind, it’s crucial to invest time in learning and practicing idiomatic expressions to ensure you utilize them effectively in your professional life.

  • Break a leg: Good luck.
  • Bite the bullet: Face a difficult situation with courage.
  • Hit the nail on the head: Be exactly right or accurate.

The list above showcases a few common American English idioms . Familiarizing yourself with such expressions and their meanings can help you connect better with your audience and impart a sense of authority and competence in your writing.

Understanding ‘Case in Point’: Definition and Origins

Delving into the legal roots and case in point origin provides valuable insight into the idiom’s meaning and how it came to be a staple of modern language. Understanding its history is crucial for using it accurately and effectively in both professional and everyday settings.

The Legal Roots of ‘Case in Point’

The phrase ‘case in point’ has its roots firmly entrenched in the legal domain. Historically, it referred to legal cases that set a precedent or served as an example for future reference. The term “in point” is likely derived from the Anglo-Norman expression “en point,” which signifies a proper or perfect condition. As a result, this idiom emphasizes the relevance and applicability of prior cases in legal proceedings and decision-making processes.

“The court should also take cognizance of a case in point from 1847, which forms a relevant precedent for the current matter at hand.”

‘Case in Point’ in Modern Usage

In today’s linguistic landscape, ‘case in point’ plays a versatile role. It operates as a shorthand for illustrating examples that support a person’s argument or confirm a particular point. This idiomatic expression is widely adopted in various settings, spanning from professional environments to informal discussions. Importantly, it remains an effective way of communicating evidence or proof to strengthen a case.

Here are some precedent examples for both professional and casual contexts:

  • In a debate on workplace efficiency, a speaker could say, “Case in point: Our recent implementation of a new project management tool saw a 25% increase in productivity.”
  • During a discussion about the impact of public art on urban environments, someone could mention, “A case in point is Chicago’s Loop, where the sculptures and murals have contributed to the revitalization of the area.”

In essence, the extensive scope of modern usage and the idiom’s deeply ingrained connections to its legal origins make ‘case in point’ a powerful, timeless expression that adds depth to both written and spoken communication.

‘Case and Point’: A Common Misconception

One common misconception about this idiom is the incorrect use of the phrase ‘case and point’ . This error stems from a combination of factors, including phonetic similarity between the correct and erroneous expressions and misunderstanding of their meanings. Using ‘case and point’ instead of the correct expression, ‘case in point’, is a glaring example of idiom misuse and can lead to writing errors that undermine one’s credibility as a writer or speaker.

“She’s a fast learner, take her quick grasp of the new software as a case and point .”

In the sentence above, the writer inadvertently used ‘case and point’ instead of the proper expression, ‘case in point’. This seemingly minor error can have a significant impact on how the statement comes across, potentially causing confusion or even diminishing the persuasiveness of the provided example.

It is essential to understand that ‘case and point’ has no validity within the English language. Over the past two centuries, usage trends show that this incorrect iteration is almost nonexistent in written English. Recognizing and avoiding this misuse highlights the importance of careful language use for effective communication.

  • Misuse: She’s a fast learner, take her quick grasp of the new software as a case and point .
  • Correct: She’s a fast learner, take her quick grasp of the new software as a case in point .

By using idiomatic expressions correctly and being mindful of common misconceptions like ‘case and point’, writers and speakers can maintain precision, credibility, and clarity in their communication efforts.

Correct Usage of ‘Case in Point’ with Examples

Understanding the proper usage of “case in point” is crucial in various contexts, ranging from professional environments to everyday conversation. The phrase serves as a powerful tool to emphasize examples that support your arguments while also demonstrating your linguistic prowess. Let’s explore this idiom’s applications in various settings.

Case in Point in Professional Contexts

In the realm of business communication and persuasive writing , “case in point” is often employed to emphasize the relevance of an example that supports your argument. This idiom can help you build credibility and reinforce the strength of your stance. Consider the following examples:

  • A company’s recent success in marketing can be attributed to their precise implementation of data-driven strategies – case in point , their latest campaign resulted in a significant increase in brand awareness and customer acquisition.
  • Although some may argue that experience is more important than adaptability, Susan’s ability to quickly learn new technologies and integrate them into her workflow is an excellent case in point for her aptness for the job.

Case in Point in Everyday Language

In everyday language and common usage , “case in point” serves to underscore examples that strengthen arguments or statements. It adds nuance and clarity to your message, enhancing the effectiveness of your communication. For instance:

  • The community is always ready to pitch in and help one another in times of need – case in point, the overwhelming response to the recent charity event organized by the local school.
  • Good customer service can make a world of difference when it comes to customer satisfaction – case in point, the boutique down the street has a loyal clientele, thanks to their attentive staff and personalized attention.

The Richness of Idioms in Expressive Writing

Idiomatic expressions, such as “case in point,” not only contribute to the expressive writing by adding depth and relatability but also reflect your mastery of the language. Using idioms effectively allows you to convey complex ideas with nuance and clarity – showcasing the richness of idioms and the variety in the English language.

As an author, it’s essential to weave illustrative expressions into your narrative to captivate your readers and enrich your storytelling. Idioms like “case in point” can serve as engaging literary devices that resonate with your audience, making your writing more memorable and impactful.

The Plight of the Misunderstood Idiom: Why ‘Case in Point’ is Often Misused

Although idioms add richness and depth to language, their misuse can reflect poorly on the writing or speech of an individual. One such example of a misunderstood idiom is the correct phrase ‘case in point’ which is often mistaken for the incorrect phrase ‘case and point.’ The confusion behind the two phrases stems largely from their phonetic similarity and the occasional ambiguity of spoken English sounds.

Language misuse can negatively impact a person’s linguistic credibility. Using incorrect phrases like ‘case and point’ instead of ‘case in point’ may lead readers or listeners to question the reliability of the content. Paying attention to the correct form and origin of commonly used idioms is essential to avoid such pitfalls and maintain a high level of professionalism in communication.

Misuse of idioms such as confusing ‘case in point’ for ‘case and point’ often stems from their phonetic similarity, leading to frequent errors in writing and speech.

Some factors contributing to the confusion between these idioms include:

  • Lack of familiarity with the idiom’s origin: An understanding of the idiom’s historical context and relation to precedent-setting legal cases can help to reinforce differentiation between ‘case in point’ and ‘case and point’.
  • Ambiguity in spoken language: In casual conversations, enunciation and articulation are not always clear. This lack of clarity can lead to comprehension issues and the generation of incorrect phrases.
  • Adaptability of idiomatic expressions: Idioms may evolve over time, or be influenced by regional dialects and vernacular, giving rise to alternate forms of expression that deviate from the original phrase.

Awareness of the correct usage of idioms like ‘case in point’ and the reasons for their confusion with misleading phrases, such as ‘case and point,’ is crucial for effective and accurate communication. Practicing careful attention to language precision helps to maintain one’s linguistic credibility, both in casual conversations and professional settings.

Remembering the Difference: Tips and Mnemonics

Although mastering idioms might be challenging, it’s essential to remember the difference between the correct phrase ‘case in point’ and the incorrect one ‘case and point.’ Luckily, some tips and mnemonic devices can help.

Using mnemonic devices or mental imagery can be a powerful way to retain information. Picture this: a rhetorician delivering a convincing argument and then sheathing the point of his discourse back into its case. Or, imagine employing the phrase ‘case in point’ as a way to poke a hole in a counterargument. Envisioning these scenarios can aid in committing the correct usage to memory.

“Case in point” is like the sharp point of an argument, driving home the main issue at hand.

Other mnemonic methods include:

  • Remember the word ‘in’ acts as a bridge, connecting ‘case’ and ‘point,’ representing a link between an example and the argument being made.
  • Create a rhyme or jingle that includes the words ‘case in point’ to reinforce the correct phrase more easily.
  • Repetition – use the correct phrase ‘case in point’ consistently in your day-to-day communication to engrain it in your vocabulary.

By using these tips and mnemonics , you’ll be well on your way to remembering the correct phrase and avoiding errors in your professional and everyday language .

‘Case in Point’ vs. ‘Case and Point’: A Look at Linguistic Trends

An analysis of linguistic trends can offer valuable insights into the evolution of language and the correct usage of idiomatic expressions. In this section, we’ll delve into the usage trends of the phrases ‘case in point’ and ‘case and point’ to demonstrate their prevalence and accuracy in the English language.

Over the years, there has been a consistent increase in the use of idiomatic expressions, which reflects the dynamic nature of language evolution . Case in point , as a popular idiom, has been widely adopted in various communication contexts, which has reinforced its relevance and correctness.

“There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.” – Victor Hugo

The above quote is an example of the influence that idiomatic expressions have on language. When examining usage trends for ‘case in point,’ it becomes evident that this phrase has stood the test of time and continues to hold a significant place in both professional and informal communication.

  • Historical Usage: The phrase ‘case in point’ has been in use since the 17th century, and has consistently gained popularity in diverse professional fields such as literature, law, marketing, and business management, among others.
  • Contemporaneous Preference: In today’s dynamic world, language is continually evolving, and new expressions emerge. Despite this, ‘case in point’ remains a preferred idiom for presenting arguments or examples in both written and oral communication.

Conversely, ‘case and point’ has a negligible existence in the world of English writing. Its usage trends indicate that the phrase is often a result of misunderstanding or mispronunciation. Nevertheless, it is crucial to avoid this flawed expression and preserve the linguistic integrity of your communication.

Understanding and keeping abreast of linguistic trends , such as the correct usage of idiomatic expressions like ‘case in point,’ can significantly enhance the overall quality and impact of your communication. By consistently choosing the right phrase, you demonstrate language proficiency and gain credibility as an effective communicator.

Why Precision in Language Matters: The Impact on Credibility and Persuasion

Language precision is crucial in maintaining credibility and effectiveness in communication. In today’s fast-paced world, clear and accurate expression goes a long way in helping you establish trust and convey your message effectively. Mastering idioms like Case in Point can be an indicator of your linguistic prowess, elevating the persuasiveness and professionalism of your writing and speech.

When you pay close attention to the accuracy of your language, you increase your chances of making a lasting impression on your audience. This, in turn, allows you to connect with them on a deeper level and enhances your overall communication skills. Employing idiomatic expressions is a surefire way to add color and excitement to your writing, capturing your reader’s attention while still getting your point across.

Ultimately, the mastery of idiomatic expressions like ‘case in point’ demonstrates your command over the language, which helps win the trust of your audience. It allows you to engage, persuade, and inspire both in professional and everyday settings. Remember, the power of clear and precise communication can’t be underestimated – it serves as the backbone of meaningful and effective interactions.

English Made Simple: Two-Minute Lessons for Busy Learners

© 2024 • TwoMinEnglish.com

A case in point

  • Post author By Pat and Stewart
  • Post date June 21, 2013

Q: I am gradually becoming obsessed with the phrase “a case in point.” Does anyone know its origin? It looks like a clumsy translation from another language (French, perhaps) but is it?

A: You’re onto something. The phrase at the heart of your obsession, “in point,” does indeed come from French—or, rather, Anglo-Norman, a dialect of Old French used by England’s Norman conquerors.

In the Anglo-Norman phrase en point , the word point refers to a state or condition, according to the Oxford English Dictionary .

The OED says the word “point” showed up in English in the early 1200s with the sense of a condition, state, situation, or plight, though that meaning is now considered historic.

In the early 1600s, according to Oxford , “point” took on another sense—appropriate or pertinent—a sense that’s now chiefly seen in the expression “case in point,” meaning an example that illustrates the point.

The dictionary’s earliest citation for the expression is from Money and the Mechanism of Exchange (1875) by William Stanley Jevons:

“The wampumpeag of the North American Indians is a case in point, as it certainly served as jewellery.”

The most recent citation is from the January 1996 issue of Scientific American:

“ Much of the ecological evidence about sex is open to sharply differing interpretations. A case in point concerns the ‘haplodipoid’ sex-determining system of ants, bees and wasps.”

And with that, we’ll buzz off.

Check out our books about the English language

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Tags English , English language , Etymology , Expression , Grammar , Language , Linguistics , Phrase origin , Usage , Word origin

Help support Grammarphobia.com

Search the blog, the blog is updated regularly read our latest posts …, subscribe to the blog by email.

Enter your email address to subscribe to the blog by email. If you are an old subscriber and not getting posts, please subscribe again.

Email Address

Other subscription options:

Subscribe via RSS

Blog archives

Cambridge Dictionary

  • Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Meaning of a case in point in English

A case in point.

{{randomImageQuizHook.quizId}}

Word of the Day

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

used to say that what you have just said is also true in the opposite order

Infinitive or -ing verb? Avoiding common mistakes with verb patterns (1)

Infinitive or -ing verb? Avoiding common mistakes with verb patterns (1)

case in point usage

Learn more with +Plus

  • Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
  • Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
  • Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
  • Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
  • English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
  • English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
  • English–Dutch Dutch–English
  • English–French French–English
  • English–German German–English
  • English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
  • English–Italian Italian–English
  • English–Japanese Japanese–English
  • English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
  • English–Polish Polish–English
  • English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
  • English–Spanish Spanish–English
  • English–Swedish Swedish–English
  • Dictionary +Plus Word Lists
  • English    Phrase
  • All translations

Add a case in point to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

{{message}}

Something went wrong.

There was a problem sending your report.

Judge fines Donald Trump more than $350 million, bars him from running businesses in N.Y. for three years

The judge who presided over a civil business fraud trial against Donald Trump on Friday ordered the former president, his sons, business associates and company to pay more than $350 million in damages and temporarily limited their ability to do business in New York.

Judge Arthur Engoron ordered the former president and the Trump Organization to pay over $354 million in damages , and barred Trump “from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation or other legal entity in New York for a period of three years,” including his namesake company.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the case, said that with pre-judgment interest, the judgment totals over $450 million, an amount “which will continue to increase every single day” until the judgment is paid.

“Donald Trump is finally facing accountability for his lying, cheating, and staggering fraud. Because no matter how big, rich, or powerful you think you are, no one is above the law,” James said in a statement, calling the ruling “a tremendous victory for this state, this nation, and for everyone who believes that we all must play by the same rules — even former presidents.”

The ruling also bars Trump and his company from applying for any bank loans for three years.

In his first public remarks after the ruling, Trump said, “We’ll appeal and we’ll be successful.”

Speaking to reporters at Mar-a-Lago on Friday night, Trump bashed the ruling as “a fine of 350 million for a doing a perfect job.” He also repeated previous attacks by calling the judge “crooked” and the attorney general “corrupt.”

Trump did not take any questions from reporters after speaking for about six minutes.

The judge’s decision is a potential blow to both Trump’s finances and persona — having built his brand on being a successful businessman that he leveraged in his first run for president. Trump is currently running for the White House for a third time. This case is just one of many he is currently facing, including four separate pending criminal trials, the first of which is scheduled to begin on March 25.

Engoron also ordered the continued “appointment of an Independent Monitor” and the “the installation of an Independent Director of Compliance” for the company.

In posts on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump called the ruling “an illegal, unAmerican judgment against me, my family, and my tremendous business.”

“This ‘decision’ is a complete and total sham,” he wrote.

During the trial, Trump and executives at his company, including his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, attempted to blame exaggerated financial statements that were the heart of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ fraud case on the accountants who compiled them. Engoron disagreed.

“There is overwhelming evidence from both interested and non-interested witnesses, corroborated by documentary evidence, that the buck for being truthful in the supporting data valuations stopped with the Trump Organization, not the accountants,” he wrote.

In explaining the need for a monitor, the judge cited the lack of remorse by Trump and his executives after the fraud was discovered.

“Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological. They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again. This is a venial sin, not a mortal sin. Defendants did not commit murder or arson. They did not rob a bank at gunpoint. Donald Trump is not Bernard Madoff. Yet, defendants are incapable of admitting the error of their ways,” Engoron wrote.

“Defendants’ refusal to admit error — indeed, to continue it, according to the Independent Monitor — constrains this Court to conclude that they will engage in it going forward unless judicially restrained,” he added.

The ruling also bars the Trump sons — who’ve been running the company since their father went to the White House — “from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation or other legal entity in New York for a period of two years.” Both were fined over $4 million, plus interest, for their roles in the scheme.

Donald Trump Jr. posted on the social media site X that “We’ve reached the point where your political beliefs combined with what venue your case is heard are the primary determinants of the outcome; not the facts of the case! It’s truly sad what’s happened to our country.”

In a statement, Eric Trump called the judge “a cruel man.”

“He knows that every single witness testified to that fact that I had absolutely NOTHING to do with this case (as INSANE as the case truly is),” Eric Trump said.

He also attacked the ruling as “political vengeance by a judge out to get my father.”

 Trump attorney Alina Habba called the verdict “a manifest injustice — plain and simple.”

“Given the grave stakes, we trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious verdict and end this relentless persecution against my clients,” she said in a statement.

A spokesperson for Trump Organization called the ruling “a gross miscarriage of justice. The Trump Organization has never missed any loan payment or been in default on any loan.”

High legal costs

An appeal in the case would likely take years, but Trump could have to post a bond for the full amount if he does so.

Read more: Trump faces about $400 million in legal penalties. Can he afford it?

The judgment is the second this year against Trump after he was hit last month with an $83.3 million verdict in writer E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against him. Trump has said he plans to appeal that verdict as well, but would have to post a bond for that amount as well.

James had been seeking $370 million from Trump, his company and its top executives, alleging “repeated and persistent fraud ” that included falsifying business records and financial statements. James had argued those financial statements were at times exaggerated by as much as $2.2 billion.

James contended the defendants used the inflated financial statements to obtain bank loans and insurance policies at rates he otherwise wouldn’t have been entitled to and “reaped hundreds of millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains.”

Trump had maintained his financial statements were conservative, and has called the AG’s allegations politically motivated and a “fraud on me.”

“This is a case that should have never been brought, and I think we should be entitled to damages,” Trump told reporters when he attended closing arguments in the case on Jan. 11.

Trump testimony knocked

The monthslong civil trial included testimony from Trump and his oldest children . The former president was combative in his day on the stand, blasting James as a “hack” and calling the judge “extremely hostile.”

Trump repeatedly complained about Engoron before and throughout the trial, and the judge slapped him with a partial gag order after he started blasting the judge’s law clerk as well. Trump’s complaints led to a flood of death threats against the clerk, as well as Engoron, court officials said, and Trump was fined $15,000 for twice violating the order.

Among the examples cited as fraud by the attorney general’s office during the trial was Trump valuing his triplex home in Trump Tower in New York City at three times its actual size and value, as well as including a brand value to increase the valuation of his golf courses on the financial statements, which explicitly said brand values were not included.

Another example pointed to by the attorney general clearly got under his skin — a dispute over the value of Mar-a-Lago, his social club and residence in Florida. Trump’s financial statements from 2011 to 2021 valued Mar-a-Lago at $426 million to $612 million, while the Palm Beach County assessor appraised the property’s market value to be $18 million to $27 million during the same time frame. Trump had also fraudulently puffed up the value of the property by saying it was a private residence, despite having signed an agreement that it could only be used as a social club to lower his tax burden.

Trump maintained during the trial the property was worth much, much more .

“The judge had it at $18 million, and it is worth, say, I say from 50 to 100 times more than that. So I don’t know how you got those numbers,” Trump testified, adding later that he thinks it’s actually worth “between a billion and a billion five.”

In his ruling Friday, Engoron said he didn’t find Trump to be a credible witness.

“Overall, Donald Trump rarely responded to the questions asked, and he frequently interjected long, irrelevant speeches on issues far beyond the scope of the trial. His refusal to answer the questions directly, or in some cases, at all, severely compromised his credibility,” the judge wrote.

Michael Cohen testimony ‘credible’

James’ investigation into the former president’s business began in 2019 as a result of congressional testimony from his former personal lawyer Michael Cohen , who told the House Oversight Committee that Trump would improperly expand and shrink values to fit whatever his business needs were.

Cohen testified during the trial about his role in the scheme, and said while Trump didn’t explicitly tell him and then-Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg to inflate the numbers in the financial statement, he was like a “mob boss” who tells you what he wants without directly telling you.

Trump claimed Cohen’s testimony exonerated him while also painting him as an untrustworthy liar because he admitted having previously lied under oath.

In his ruling, Engoron called Cohen an “important witness” and said he found his testimony “credible.” “This factfinder does not believe that pleading guilty to perjury means that you can never tell the truth. Michael Cohen told the truth,” the judge wrote.

Former CFO ‘evasive’

Engoron was less forgiving about former Trump CFO Weisselberg, who previously pleaded guilty to carrying out tax fraud at the company.

Weisselberg’s “testimony in this trial was intentionally evasive, with large gaps of ‘I don’t remember.’”

“There is overwhelming evidence that Allen Weisselberg intentionally falsified hundreds of business records during his tenure” at the company, the judge wrote. “Weisselberg understood that his assignment from Donald Trump was to have his reported assets increase every year irrespective of their actual values. The examples of Weisselberg’s intent to falsify business records are too numerous to itemize,” he added.

The judge permanently barred Weisselberg “from serving in the financial control function of any New York corporation or similar business entity operating in New York State,” and ordered him to pay the $1 million he’s already received from his $2 million separation agreement from the company as “ill-gotten gains.”

AG initially sought less

James filed her suit seeking $250 million in damages from Trump in 2022, and the judge appointed a monitor to oversee the company’s finances that November.

In a summary judgment  ruling the week before the trial started, Engoron found Trump and his executives had repeatedly engaged in fraud. The “documents here clearly contain fraudulent valuations that defendants used in business, satisfying [the attorney general’s] burden to establish liability as a matter of law against defendants,” the judge wrote, while denying Trump’s bid to dismiss the case.

Engoron summarized the Trump defense as “the documents do not say what they say; that there is no such thing as ‘objective’ value; and that, essentially, the Court should not believe its own eyes.”

The order, which Trump appealed, held that Trump’s business certificates in New York should be canceled, which could have wreaked havoc on Trump’s company and forced the sell-off of some assets.

Engoron backed off of that decision in his ruling Friday, saying the addition of the “two-tiered oversight” of the monitor and the compliance director makes that move “no longer necessary.”

Trump had complained about the summary judgment ruling while he was on the witness stand. “He said I was a fraud before he knew anything about me, nothing about me,” Trump said. “It’s a terrible thing you did.”

case in point usage

Adam Reiss is a reporter and producer for NBC and MSNBC.

case in point usage

Dareh Gregorian is a politics reporter for NBC News.

  • Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Supreme Court Won’t Hear New Case on Race and School Admissions

The decision, along with an order this month declining to block West Point’s admissions program, suggests that most justices are not eager to immediately explore the limits of its ruling from June.

School buildings viewed from across a reflecting pool with a metal sculpture in the foreground.

By Adam Liptak

Reporting from Washington

The Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for the use of admissions criteria intended to diversify the student body at an elite public high school in Virginia, declining to revisit the role race may play in admissions months after it sharply curtailed affirmative action programs in higher education.

In turning down a challenge to a policy that eliminated standardized tests, the court gave no reasons, as is its custom in issuing such orders. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. issued a dissent, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, that was harshly critical of an appeals court’s ruling in the case upholding the new criteria and rejecting the challengers’ argument that they unlawfully disadvantaged Asian Americans.

The Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina in June but left open the constitutionality of admissions standards like the ones in Virginia that do not directly account for race in trying to diversify enrollment.

The court’s decision not to take up the case from Virginia, along with an order this month declining to block West Point’s race-conscious admissions program, suggests that most of the justices are not eager to take immediate steps to explore the limits of its ruling from June. It takes four votes to grant review, for instance, and the Virginia case failed to clear that bar.

In his dissent on Tuesday, Justice Alito expressed frustration.

The Supreme Court’s “willingness to swallow the aberrant decision below is hard to understand,” Justice Alito wrote. “We should wipe the decision off the books, and because the court refuses to do so, I must respectfully dissent.”

The revisions to the Virginia admissions program followed protests over the 2020 murder of George Floyd. Amid concerns about how few Black and Hispanic students attended the school, one of the country’s top public high schools, Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Va., adopted what it said were race-neutral admissions standards. The school board did away with a rigorous entrance examination and prioritized admission to the top students from each public middle school in the area rather than the top applicants from any school.

Admissions officers were also instructed to consider “experience factors,” such as whether students were poor, learning English or attending a middle school that was “historically underrepresented.” But the officers were not told the race, sex or name of any applicant.

A group of parents, many of them Asian American, objected to the plan and, calling themselves the Coalition for T.J. , sued to stop it.

Joshua Thompson, a lawyer with the Pacific Legal Foundation, a libertarian law group representing the parents’ group, expressed disappointment that the justices had declined to intervene.

“Discrimination against students based on their race is not only ethically wrong but also a clear violation of the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection,” he said in a statement.

Karl Frisch, the chair of the Fairfax County School Board, said he welcomed the conclusion of a yearslong litigation.

“We have long believed that the new admissions process is both constitutional and in the best interest of all of our students,” he said in a statement. “It guarantees that all qualified students from all neighborhoods in Fairfax County have a fair shot at attending this exceptional high school.”

Richard D. Kahlenberg , a proponent of class-conscious affirmative action, said the court had struck the right balance, handing a victory to “poor and working-class students of all races.”

“This is an important signal that selective high schools and colleges and universities should feel confident in using race-neutral strategies to achieve diversity,” he said in a statement.

The Supreme Court’s action let stand a ruling from a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va., which declared in May that Thomas Jefferson did not discriminate in its admissions. The Pacific Legal Foundation asked the Supreme Court to hear their appeal, saying the new admissions plan was “intentionally designed to achieve the same results as overt racial discrimination.”

The Supreme Court’s decision in June in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard , the coalition’s petition said, “might mean little if schools could accomplish the same discriminatory result through race-neutral proxies.” The petition noted that Chief Justice John. G. Roberts Jr.’s majority opinion, quoting an earlier ruling, had said that “what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly.”

Lawyers for the school board responded that the new admissions criteria had nothing to do with race and were focused instead on removing socioeconomic and geographic barriers.

“The new policy is both race neutral and race blind,” the school board’s brief said. “It was not designed to produce, and did not in fact produce, a student population that approximates the racial demographics of Fairfax County or any other predetermined racial balance.”

After the changes went into effect in 2021, the percentage of Asian American students offered admission dropped to 54 percent from 73 percent. The percentage of Black students grew to 8 percent from no more than 2 percent; the percentage of Hispanic students grew to 11 percent from 3 percent; and the percentage of white students grew to 22 percent from 18 percent.

In the Fairfax County school system in 2020, about 37 percent of students were white, 27 percent were Hispanic, 20 percent were Asian and 10 percent were Black.

Writing for the majority in the appeals court’s decision in May, Judge Robert B. King , who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, said the before and after numbers were not the right place to start. That would, he said, quoting from the school board’s brief, turn “the previous status quo into an immutable quota.”

He added that the school had a legitimate interest in “expanding the array of student backgrounds.”

Justice Alito, in dissent on Tuesday, questioned that reasoning. “What the Fourth Circuit majority held, in essence, is that intentional racial discrimination is constitutional so long as it is not too severe,” Justice Alito wrote. “This reasoning is indefensible, and it cries out for correction.”

He elaborated, quoting from an earlier decision. “Even though the new policy bore ‘more heavily’ on Asian American applicants (because it diminished their chances of admission while improving the chances of every other racial group), the panel majority held that there was no disparate impact because they were still overrepresented in the T.J. student body,” Justice Alito wrote.

He added: “That is a clearly mistaken understanding of what it means for a law or policy to have a disparate effect on the members of a particular racial or ethnic group.”

In dissent in the Fourth Circuit, Judge Allison J. Rushing , who was appointed by President Donald J. Trump, made a similar point. The majority, she wrote, had refused “to look past the policy’s neutral varnish” and consider instead “an undisputed racial motivation and an undeniable racial result.”

The decision reversed a 2022 ruling by Judge Claude M. Hilton of the Federal District Court in Alexandria, who found that the changes made by the school board had disproportionately burdened Asian American students and were “racially motivated.”

“It is clear that Asian American students are disproportionately harmed by the board’s decision to overhaul T.J. admissions,” Judge Hilton wrote. “Currently and in the future, Asian American applicants are disproportionately deprived of a level playing field.”

Adam Liptak covers the Supreme Court and writes Sidebar, a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law for 14 years before joining The Times in 2002. More about Adam Liptak

US health tech giant Change Healthcare hit by cyberattack

case in point usage

U.S. healthcare technology giant Change Healthcare has confirmed a cyberattack on its systems. In a brief statement Wednesday, the company said it was “experiencing a network interruption related to a cyber security issue.”

“Once we became aware of the outside threat, in the interest of protecting our partners and patients, we took immediate action to disconnect our systems to prevent further impact,” Change Healthcare wrote on its status page . “The disruption is expected to last at least through the day.”

The incident began early on Wednesday morning on the U.S. East Coast, according to the incident tracker.

The specific nature of the cybersecurity incident was not disclosed. Most of the login pages for Change Healthcare were inaccessible or offline when TechCrunch checked at the time of writing.

Michigan local newspaper the Huron Daily Tribune is reporting that local pharmacies are experiencing outages due to the Change Healthcare cyberattack.

Scheurer Health, a healthcare provider in Michigan, said on its Facebook page that it cannot currently process prescriptions through patients’ insurance, citing the “nationwide outage from the largest prescription processor in North America,” referring to Change Healthcare.

Change Healthcare is one of the largest healthcare technology companies in the United States. Change Healthcare handles patient payments across the U.S. healthcare system. The tech giant boasts on its website that it handles 15 billion healthcare transactions annually and that one-in-three U.S. patient records are “touched by our clinical connectivity solutions.”

In 2022, health insurance giant UnitedHealth Group completed its merger of U.S. healthcare services giant Optum and Change Healthcare in a $7.8 billion deal, which allowed Optum broad access to patient records on tens of millions of Americans .

Optum provides technology and data to insurance companies and healthcare services. Both Optum and Change Healthcare are owned by health insurance giant UnitedHealth Group.

When reached by email Thursday, Optum spokesperson Andrew Krejci declined to comment beyond what was published on the incident tracker. Krejci would not say for what evidence Optum has to suspect a cybersecurity incident.

Neither spokespeople for Change Healthcare or UnitedHealth Group have commented.

Late Thursday, UnitedHealth attributed the cyberattack to likely government-backed hackers , without saying which nation state.

Updated with response from Optum, and corrected the start of the cyberattack to early Wednesday.

Read more on TechCrunch:

  • Postmeds data breach hits millions of patients
  • Truepill says hackers accessed sensitive data of 2.3 million patients
UnitedHealth says Change Healthcare hacked by nation state, as pharmacy outages drag on
  • Choose your language...
  • English (English)
  • Spanish (Español)
  • French (Français)
  • German (Deutsch)
  • Italian (Italiano)
  • Portuguese (Português)
  • Japanese (日本語)
  • Chinese (中文)
  • Korean (한국어)
  • Taiwan (繁體中文)
  • Organization Size
  • Hybrid Cloud
  • Zero Trust & Least Privilege
  • Developer Security & Operations
  • IoT Security Solutions
  • Anti-Ransomware

...

See how use cases come to life through Check Point's customer stories.

  • Financial Services
  • Federal Government
  • State & Local Government
  • Telco Service Provider
  • Small & Medium Business
  • Infinity Platform
  • Secure the Network
  • Secure the Cloud
  • Secure the Workspace
  • Core Services
  • Platform Overview Industry leading AI-Powered and Cloud-Delivered cyber security platform
  • Infinity Core Services Prevention first security operations, AI Copilot, ThreatCloud AI, and 24/7 managed security services, consulting and training
  • Infinity Portal Learn about and sign into Check Point's unified security management platform
  • Infinity Platform Agreement Predictable cyber-security environments through a platform agreement

...

Introducing Quantum Force

  • Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) Security Gateway Industry-leading AI powered security gateways for modern enterprises
  • SD-WAN Software Defined Wide Area networks converging security with networking
  • Security Policy and Threat Management Manage firewall and security policy on a unified platform for on-premises and cloud networks
  • Operational Technology and Internet of Things (IoT) Autonomous IoT/OT threat prevention with zero-trust profiling, virtual patching and segmentation
  • Remote Access VPN Secure, seamless remote access to corporate networks
  • Cloud Network Security Industry-leading threat prevention through cloud-native firewalls
  • Cloud Native Application Protection Platform Cloud native prevention first security
  • Code Security Developer centric code security
  • Web Application and API Security Automated application and API security
  • Email and Collaboration Security Email security including office & collaboration apps
  • Endpoint Security Comprehensive endpoint protection to prevent attacks & data compromise
  • Mobile Security Complete protection for the mobile workforce across all mobile devices
  • SASE Unifying security with optimized internet and network connectivity
  • Managed Prevention & Response Service SOC operations as a service with Infinty MDR/MPR
  • Extended Prevention & Response AI-Powered, Cloud-Delivered Security Operations with Infinity XDR/XPR
  • Secure Automation and Collaboration Automate response playbooks with Infinity Playblocks
  • Unified Security Events and Logs as a Service Infinity Events cloud-based analysis, monitoring and reporting
  • AI Powered Teammate Automated Security Admin & Incident Response with AI Copilot
  • ThreatCloud AI The Brain behind Check Point’s threat prevention
  • Cyber Security Risk Assessment Assess cyber security maturity and plan actionable goals
  • Penetration Testing Evaluate security defenses against potential cyber attacks and threats
  • Security Controls Gap Analysis (NIST CIS) Analyze technology gaps and plan solutions for improved security and ROI
  • Threat Intelligence Analyzed data on cyber threats, aiding proactive security measures
  • See All Infinity Global Services >

...

Learn hackers inside secrets and beat them at their own game

  • Security Deployment & Optimization Strategic deployment and refinement of security for optimal protection
  • Advanced Technical Account Management Proactive service delivered by highly skilled Cyber Security professionals
  • Lifecycle Management Services Effectively maintain the lifecycle of security products and services
  • Certifications & Accreditations Comprehensive cyber security training and certification programs
  • CISO Training Globally recognized training for Chief Information Security Officers
  • Security Awareness Empower employees with cyber security skills for work and home
  • Cyber Range Simulated gamification environment for security training
  • Mind Check Point Cyber Security and Awareness Programs training hub
  • Incident Response Manage and mitigate security incidents with systematic response services
  • Managed Detection and Response Prioritize prevention, delivering comprehensive SOC operations as a service
  • Digital Forensics Comprehensive investigation and analysis of cyber incidents and attacks
  • MXDR with Managed SIEM
  • Managed Firewalls
  • EDR with Agent Management
  • Managed CNAPP
  • Managed CSPM
  • Support Programs Programs designed to help maximize security technology utilization
  • Check Point PRO Proactive monitoring of infrastructure program offerings
  • Contact Support
  • Platform Overview
  • Infinity Core Services
  • Infinity Portal
  • Infinity Platform Agreement
  • Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) Security Gateway
  • Security Policy and Threat Management
  • Operational Technology and Internet of Things (IoT)
  • Remote Access VPN
  • Cloud Network Security
  • Cloud Native Application Protection Platform
  • Code Security
  • Web Application and API Security
  • Email and Collaboration Security
  • Endpoint Security
  • Mobile Security
  • Managed Prevention & Response Service
  • Extended Prevention & Response
  • Secure Automation and Collaboration
  • Unified Security Events and Logs as a Service
  • AI Powered Teammate
  • ThreatCloud AI
  • Cyber Security Risk Assessment
  • Penetration Testing
  • Security Controls Gap Analysis (NIST CIS)
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Security Deployment & Optimization
  • Advanced Technical Account Management
  • Lifecycle Management Services
  • Certifications & Accreditations
  • CISO Training
  • Security Awareness
  • Cyber Range
  • Incident Response
  • Managed Detection and Response
  • Digital Forensics
  • Support Programs
  • Check Point PRO
  • Find a Partner
  • Channel Partners
  • Technology Partners
  • MSSP Partners
  • Azure Cloud
  • Partner Portal

...

Check Point is 100% Channel. Grow Your Business with Us!

  • Investor Relations
  • Resource Center
  • Customer Stories
  • Events & Webinars
  • Check Point Research
  • Cyber Talk for Executives
  • CheckMates Community

...

Check Point Software Unveils Comprehensive 2024 Security Report, Highlighting Ransomware Surge and AI Defense Innovations

Highpoints from the report include an analysis on the pervasiveness of ransomware and how defenders are fighting back against ai-powered cyberattacks.

Check Point Research (CPR), the Threat Intelligence arm of Check Point® Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHKP), a leading AI-powered, cloud-delivered cyber security platform provider, released its much-anticipated 2024 Annual Security Report. This year’s edition delves into the increasing complexity of cyber threats, with a special focus on the dramatic rise in ransomware incidents and the strategic use of AI in cyber security defenses.

Reflecting on a year marked by significant cyber turmoil, the report highlights a 90% increase in publicly extorted victims of ransomware attacks. Such ransomware attacks now account for 10% of all malware detected by Check Point’s sensors. The Check Point Incident Response Team (CPIRT) observed that nearly half of their cases involved ransomware, with the number of publicly shamed victims soaring to approximately 5,000, doubling from the previous year.

Key Findings of the 2024 Security Report include:

  • Ransomware Evolution: Attackers have refined their strategies, leveraging zero-day vulnerabilities and enhancing Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) with new extortion tactics. High-value targets are increasingly in the crosshairs, demonstrating the need for robust defense mechanisms.
  • Targeting Edge Devices: The report identifies a growing trend in attacks on edge devices, highlighting the critical need for comprehensive security measures that encompass all network elements.
  • Rise in Hacktivism: State-supported hacktivism has escalated, with notable increases in cyber activities tied to geopolitical conflicts. The use of destructive wipers for maximum impact underscores the evolving nature of cyber warfare.

Maya Horowitz, VP of Research at Check Point commented, “In an era of relentless innovation in cyber crime and accumulating tensions involving nation-state threat actors and hacktivists globally, organisations must adapt. Investing in stronger defenses with robust AI-powered and cloud-delivered cyber security measures, and proactively fostering collaboration, is key to effectively safeguarding against these evolving dangers.”

The 2024 Security Report serves as a crucial resource for organizations, policymakers, and cyber security professionals, offering deep insights into attack trends and providing guidance for strengthening cyber resilience. The findings are based on data drawn from the Check Point ThreatCloud AI Cyber-Threat Map which looks at the key tactics cyber criminals are using to carry out their attacks. A full copy of the report is available here .

Follow Check Point Software via: X (Formerly known as Twitter): https://www.twitter.com/checkpointsw Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/checkpointsoftware Blog: https://blog.checkpoint.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/CPGlobal LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/check-point-software-technologies

About Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. ( www.checkpoint.com ) is a leading AI-powered, cloud-delivered cyber security platform provider protecting over 100,000 organizations worldwide. Check Point leverages the power of AI everywhere to enhance cyber security efficiency and accuracy through its Infinity Platform, with industry-leading catch rates enabling proactive threat anticipation and smarter, faster response times. The comprehensive platform includes cloud-delivered technologies consisting of Check Point Harmony to secure the workspace, Check Point CloudGuard to secure the cloud, Check Point Quantum to secure the network, and Check Point Infinity Core Services for collaborative security operations and services.

Alert icon

IMAGES

  1. "Case In Point" Meaning with Useful Examples in English • 7ESL

    case in point usage

  2. Case in Point or Case and Point

    case in point usage

  3. Case in Point or Case and Point

    case in point usage

  4. Case in Point or Case and Point

    case in point usage

  5. Case in Point or Case and Point

    case in point usage

  6. Case in Point or Case and Point

    case in point usage

VIDEO

  1. Tablet protective case usage tutorial

  2. Use case based Estimation

  3. 4. HPC usage

  4. Forward Perpendicular Parking

  5. Case & Point

  6. SWAT TEAM FIRES AT CITIZEN FOR FILMING FROM THEIR HOUSE!

COMMENTS

  1. How To Use "A Case In Point" In A Sentence: Diving Deeper

    A case in point is a phrase commonly used in English language to highlight or illustrate a specific example or instance that supports or proves a particular argument or point. It is often used to provide evidence or support for a general statement or claim. Basic Definition Of "A Case In Point"

  2. Case in point Definition & Meaning

    : a typical or relevant case More from Merriam-Webster on case in point Thesaurus: All synonyms and antonyms for case in point Last Updated: 23 Feb 2024 - Updated example sentences

  3. A CASE IN POINT

    A CASE IN POINT definition: 1. an example that shows that what you are saying is true or helps to explain why you are saying…. Learn more.

  4. "case in point" vs. "case and point"

    A case in point is a specific example of what's being discussed, as in "People in my family live a long time. My 102-year-old grandmother is a case in point ." This idiom from the mid-1600s began in the courtroom, where a case in point referred to a previous court case that was similar to the one being tried.

  5. The Fossil Encased in "Case In Point"

    The idiom "case in point" dates to the 1600s and refers to an instance or example that supports, or is relevant or pertinent to, what is being discussed. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the phrase began as a legal term to refer to a judicial precedent to be followed by a judge when deciding a later similar case.

  6. Case in Point or Case and Point

    Case in point is an idiom that means an example that supports one's argument. Merriam-Webster first recorded its use 1647, and it has been a popular expression ever since. Here are few examples of case in point in sentences: "The way you dress communicates a lot about your personality, case in point, Todd's sloppy outfit today," said Todd's boss.

  7. Case in Point or Case and Point

    | Idiom Is it case in point or case and point? It's actually case in point, but what does the phrase even mean? Well, I'll explain everything you need to know about its meaning and how you're supposed to use it when speaking or writing. Is It Case in Point or Case and Point? Case in point vs. Case and point usage trend.

  8. Definition of 'a case in point'

    English Dictionary Sentences Grammar Definition of 'a case in point' a case in point phrase If you say that something is a case in point, you mean that it is a good example of something you have just mentioned . In many cases religious persecution is the cause of people fleeing their country. A case in point is colonial India.

  9. Proper use of 'case-in-point' at the start of a statement

    1 Answer Sorted by: 0 a case in point TFD An example that demonstrates a point being made as truthful or correct As in: It's important to always encrypt your data so hackers can't steal it. The recent data breach is a case in point. Your usage is OK: "Case in point: You can't serve your customer in XYZ mall from China."

  10. Definition of 'a case in point'

    a case in point. If you say that something is a case in point, you mean that it is a good example of something you have just mentioned . In many cases religious persecution is the cause of people fleeing their country. A case in point is colonial India. Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's Dictionary.

  11. How To Use "Case In Point" In A Sentence: Proper Usage Tips

    1. Placement: "Case in point" is typically used as a standalone phrase, rather than integrated into the structure of a sentence. It is commonly placed at the beginning or end of a sentence to emphasize the example being presented. 2.

  12. How to use "case in point" in a sentence

    Examples from Classical Literature What I said just now about the Absolute of transcendental idealism is a case in point. The wampumpeag of the North American Indians is a case in point, as it certainly served as jewellery. A case in point is Orestes pursued by the furies, as described by the poets.

  13. CASE IN POINT Definition & Usage Examples

    Case in point definition: . See examples of CASE IN POINT used in a sentence.

  14. Is the usage of "case in point" correct in this sentence?

    Is the use of "case in point" correct? The definitions and examples I've found seem to use this expression only to introduce actual cases or examples, and not an explanation. Should I change the sentence to something like the following?

  15. "Case In Point" Meaning with Useful Examples in English • 7ESL

    The meaning of the phrase "case in point" is something or someone that is a good symbol or illustration of a prior fact previously mentioned. Origin of the common idiomatic expression This popular phrase was derived from a shorter phrase that was used many years ago.

  16. 'Case in Point' or 'Case and Point': What's the Difference?

    'Case' can refer to something that serves as an example, and 'point' refers to an idea that you try to make people understand or accept. Therefore, the meaning of 'case in point' is: "an instance or example that supports, or is relevant or pertinent to, what is being discussed."

  17. What Does Case in Point Mean?

    Case is sometimes used in a similar way to for example, and over time people started saying case in point instead of just in point. In point originated in English around the year 1658, and case in point came a little later, in the 1700s. Another related idiom is in point of fact. A common error is to structure this phrase case and point.

  18. Is It "Case and Point" or "Case in Point"?

    Choosing between "case in point" or "case and point" could completely change the meaning of a sentence — especially since only "case in point" is correct.

  19. 'Case in Point' or 'Case and Point': What's the Difference?

    'Case in Point' in Modern Usage In today's linguistic landscape, 'case in point' plays a versatile role. It operates as a shorthand for illustrating examples that support a person's argument or confirm a particular point.

  20. The Grammarphobia Blog: A case in point

    In the early 1600s, according to Oxford, "point" took on another sense—appropriate or pertinent—a sense that's now chiefly seen in the expression "case in point," meaning an example that illustrates the point. The dictionary's earliest citation for the expression is from Money and the Mechanism of Exchange (1875) by William ...

  21. Examples of "Case-in-point" in a Sentence

    A case in point is the employment of hydraulic lime in place of Portland cement as grouting outside the cast-iron tubes used for lining tunnels made by the shield system. 2 0 The hard disk personal video recorder is a case in point. 1 0 The current collection is a case in point. 1 0

  22. Literal breakdown of the phrase "case in point"

    In point comes from French. World Wide Words explains it as follows: [I]t was once possible to say in point by itself, meaning something appropriate, relevant or pertinent, but it survives only in phrases like this one.. It derives from the French à point, meaning the same as à propos, something relevant or to the point.The first example of the English form seems to be this from 1658 ...

  23. A CASE IN POINT definition

    A CASE IN POINT meaning: 1. an example that shows that what you are saying is true or helps to explain why you are saying…. Learn more.

  24. Judge Engoron fines Trump more than $350M, bars him from running

    New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the case, said that with pre-judgment interest, the judgment totals over $450 million, an amount "which will continue to increase ...

  25. Supreme Court Won't Hear New Case on Race and School Admissions

    The court's decision not to take up the case from Virginia, along with an order this month declining to block West Point's race-conscious admissions program, suggests that most of the justices ...

  26. US health tech giant Change Healthcare hit by cyberattack

    Do you work at Change Healthcare and know more about the cyberattack? Get in touch on Signal and WhatsApp at +1 646-755-8849, or by email.You can also send files and documents via SecureDrop.

  27. Check Point Software Unveils Comprehensive 2024 Security Report

    Check Point Research (CPR), the Threat Intelligence arm of Check Point® Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHKP), a leading AI-powered, cloud-delivered cyber security platform provider, released its much-anticipated 2024 Annual Security Report. This year's edition delves into the increasing complexity of cyber threats, with a special focus on the dramatic rise in ransomware incidents and ...