regeneration case study geography

Find Study Materials for

• Business Studies
• Combined Science
• Computer Science
• Engineering
• English Literature
• Environmental Science
• Human Geography
• Macroeconomics
• Microeconomics
• Social Studies
• Browse all subjects
• Read our Magazine

Create Study Materials

Dive into the fascinating depths of the Olympic Park Case Study, a detailed exploration of one of the world's most dynamic urban regeneration projects. Offering a comprehensive understanding of the key factors that drove its success, this article serves as an authentic guide. Learn about the local and environmental challenges faced, the inventive solutions implemented, and the significant impacts of this extraordinary case study. Whether it's the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, or the wider London Olympic Park, you will discover the intrinsic details and noteworthy insights that have been gained from this transformative endeavour.

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

• Olympic Park Case Study
• Explanations
• StudySmarter AI
• Textbook Solutions
• London Urbanisation
• Rio de Janeiro Case Study
• UK Population Distribution
• Urban Issues and Challenges
• Changing Economic World
• Coasts Geography
• Diverse Places
• Dynamic Landscapes
• Energy Security
• Glaciated Landscapes
• Global Resource Management
• Globalisation
• Health And Human Rights
• Living With The Physical Environment
• Living World
• Migration and Identity
• Regenerating Places
• River Landscapes
• Superpowers of the World
• Sustainable Urban Development
• Water Cycle

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Understanding the Olympic Park Case Study

When you delve into the realm of geography, you often encounter fascinating multi-dimensional studies like the Olympic Park Case Study. This intriguing example throws light on how major global events can contribute positively to urban development and regeneration.

An Olympic Park is a sports complex built for the Olympic Games. It typically includes sporting, recreational, and ancillary facilities used during and after the events.

An Overview of the Olympic Park Case Study

In the exciting world of geographical studies, the Olympic Park Case Study stands out as a shining example of urban regeneration. This case study chiefly focuses on the Olympic Park constructed for the 2012 London Olympics.

Key details of this project are :

The site's former use: The area prior to redevelopment was a neglected, inequalities affected part of East London with many challenges, including high deprivation levels and infrastructure shortcomings.

Infrastructure created: The Olympic Park regeneration project was vast, covering an area of 2.5 square km.\( {\displaystyle \text{Area} =2.5 \text{km}^{2}} \)

This massive development saw the construction of venues for the Games, residential buildings, parks, and world-class infrastructure.

Post-Games use: Following the Games, the legacy plan aimed to transform East London, improving the quality of life and creating a sustainable community.

The Olympic Park regeneration project has since been hailed as a global model for urban regeneration, inspiring similar developments worldwide.

Key Factors in the Olympic Park Case Study

The Olympic Park Case Study is packed with a notable depth of dimensions.

• The planning process: a comprehensive plan, well-thought-out and executed meticulously.
• Impact on the local economy: A substantial increase in potential job opportunities and economic growth within the region.
• Geographical considerations: Choices in terms of location, dealing with existing geographical obstacles, and sustainability issues.

Insight into these key factors provides an essential understanding of why this redevelopment project has been so successful.

Sustainability in this context refers to the project's capacity to maintain its operations and values over the long term without negatively affecting the surrounding environment or society.

As you further delve into the Olympic Park Case Study, you will gain deeper insights into the world of Geography through the lens of urban regeneration.

Into the Details: Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study

Shifting the focus to the heart of our discussion - the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study. This case study offers a deeper and more intricate exploration of the impact of the Olympic Games, coupled with the strategic regeneration of a deprived urban area. It's a remarkable blend of sports, urban planning, and geography.

Understanding the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study

When you delve into the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study, it feels like unravelling a multifaceted narrative laden with geographical significance. The park, formerly known as the Olympic Park , was renamed to honour Queen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee in 2012.

A Diamond Jubilee is a celebration held to mark a 60th anniversary. In this case, it marked the 60th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II's reign.

The vast 560-acre Park is located in Stratford, East London , and was developed to host the 2012 London Olympics and Paralympics. It was one of the most significant urban transformations in the UK for decades.

The ambitious project's key objectives included improving the local economy, environment, social aspects, and sports infrastructure. It was not just about hosting the Olympics but about benefiting the local community long after the Games. That's what makes it a prime case study in geography, where studying the interaction between people and places holds significance.

Interestingly, the construction team for the Olympic Park focused on using recycled materials whenever possible. For example, the concrete used was made of 30% recycled content, showing an admirable commitment to sustainable construction.

Major Aspects of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study

Diving into the major aspects of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study, you'll discover some fascinating facts and considerations. Among them, the project's planning and execution, the engagement with the local community, its socio-economic impact, and last but not least, the focus on sustainability .

Sustainability refers to meeting our own needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It intertwines with all aspects of human life, from economic growth and social inclusiveness to environmental protection.

Let's break down these major aspects:

• Planning and execution: Comprehensive masterplanning allowed for meticulous execution. The team behind this ambitious project prioritised health and safety, efficient management, and timely delivery.
• Community engagement: Community involvement was integral to the project. Activities included consultations, local employment, and volunteer opportunities, all aimed at fostering community spirit.
• Socio-economic impact: The project significantly contributed to East London's socio-economic development, bringing in investments, creating jobs, and attracting businesses.
• Sustainability: Sustainability was at the heart of the project. It was built into the design, construction, and legacy of the Park.

One example of sustainability was the creation of the UK's largest man-made wetland in over a century. This wetland provides a habitat for wildlife and manages flood risk in the area.

The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study provides a comprehensive look at how major sporting events can serve as a catalyst for considerable urban regeneration. The study showcases how strategic planning, sociological insight, and environmental stewardliness can combine to create a lasting legacy of growth and development.

Exploring the London Olympic Park Case Study

When it comes to exploring the intersection of geography and large-scale urban regeneration projects, the London Olympic Park Case Study stands as a testament to the transformative power of such initiatives. This thorough investigation unearths how the 2012 Olympic Games served as an opportunity to initiate widespread change, reshaping and revitalising an entire district of London.

A Detailed Look at the London Olympic Park Case Study

An in-depth dive into the story behind the London Olympic Park brings to light its intriguing genesis, multifaceted execution, and its ongoing impact on the local community and beyond.

Before the ambitious regeneration project took shape, the area now known as the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park was characterised by industrial wasteland, rundown buildings, and a lack of sufficient infrastructure.

The project planning aimed at not merely building a temporary sports facility, but the long-term strategy focused on revitalising the entire community—building new homes, commercial spaces, parks and sports facilities that would continue to serve the community and attract visitors long after the Games concluded.

The massive 2.5-square km area was to host a collection of Olympic venues on a grand scale. These included the Olympic Stadium, the Aquatics Centre, the Velodrome, and the IBC/MPC complex that was set up to serve the world’s media during the Games.

Apart from these, the project also involved a comprehensive upgrade of the local infrastructure including transport links, power, sewage and water systems, ensuring the area was well-equipped to handle the influx of spectators during the Games, while serving as a robust foundation for future growth.

Infrastructure refers to the fundamental physical and organisational structures, facilities, and systems required for the operation of a city or society. This includes transportation, utilities, and various public services.

Noteworthy Insights from the London Olympic Park Case Study

The London Olympic Park Case Study is a treasure trove of valuable insights, examining not only the planning and development aspects but also the socio-economic and environmental impacts of the project.

A key aspect that stands out in this case study is the deliberate focus on creating a sustainable legacy . A significant part of this was the emphasis on 'green' construction methods. For instance, over 98% of the demolition materials from the old structures were recycled and used in the new development.

Some of the most noteworthy accomplishments include:

• Job creation: The project resulted in the employment of around 30,000 workers during its development phase and continues to provide an economic boost to the local community through the creation of jobs and businesses.
• Urban regeneration: The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park has breathed new life into the Stratford area, transforming it from a deprived to a thriving community.
• Infrastructure development: Significant upgrade of public infrastructure, including roads, bridges, utilities, and public transportation, enhancing the overall quality of life in the area.
• Environmental protection: Sustainable construction methods and the development of green spaces, contributing to the global sustainability agenda.

Urban regeneration is the process of redeveloping underused or derelict urban areas to bring about physical and economic improvements. This often involves upgrades to infrastructure, the creation of new job opportunities, and improvements to the local environment.

The London Olympic Park Case Study is a shining example of how astute planning, sustainable practices, and a community-centric approach can lead to transformative urban development, making it an intriguing area of study in the broader field of geography.

The Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study

The Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study serves as an impressive beacon of urban renewal and sustainable development. It showcases the strategic alignment of sports, urban planning, community needs, and environmental considerations to reimagine and revitalise a significant part of East London.

An Examination of the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study

Undertaking a detailed exploration of the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study, you'll be introduced to a remarkable transformation story, marked by careful planning, innovative design, social upliftment, and environmental safeguarding.

Focusing on the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, the case study takes you through the park's journey from being an underutilised and neglected area to a vibrant, modern and sustainable community-space post the 2012 London Olympics. Through the lens of geography and urban planning, this study sheds light on the interplay of spatial relationships, socio-economic factors, and biodiversity concerns that shaped this project.

For instance, the transformation took into account the existing waterways in the area. These were not only cleaned and protected, but also seamlessly integrated into the park's layout to enhance the space's attractiveness and support local biodiversity.

The fact that designs encouraged the use of repurposed materials from the site during construction is an exemplar of sustainable practices. Moreover, through the creation of renewable energy sources within the park, a commitment to protecting the environment for the long term was demonstrated.

The case study further examines the positive social impact resulting from the project. The development of new residential areas, creation of numerous jobs, focus on public access, and commitment to maintaining a communal recreational space emphasised people's needs and improved the quality of life.

Quality of life is a measure of the general well-being and satisfaction derived from a combination of factors like physical health, employment, education, environmental quality and recreational opportunities.

Important Factors in the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study

Investigating important factors within the scope of the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study reveals key takeaways spanning from design strategies and sustainability practices to social integration and urban planning.

Four crucial aspects underpinning the success of the project were:

• Design strategy: Careful and detailed planning took into consideration the geographical features and accommodated infrastructural needs, community areas, and the overall aesthetic appeal.
• Sustainability practices: Eco-friendly construction methods and renewable energy sources were central in laying out foundations and future developments in the park, aligning with global sustainability goals.
• Social integration: Factoring in the needs of the local community ensured long-term benefits. This is apparent in the creation of housing, business opportunities, and recreational spaces.
• Urban planning: Key infrastructural upgrades, including improved transportation links, played a significant role in revitalising East London and connecting it efficiently with wider London.

A unique example of urban planning was the establishment of the Chobham Academy within the Olympic Park. This institution welcomed students regardless of their ages or abilities, acting as a hub for education and community events right from the start.

Urban planning is a technical and political process concerned with the use of land and design of the urban environment, encompassing air, water, and infrastructure passing into and out of urban areas. It effectively promotes sustainability, health, and safety in communities.

These key insights from the Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study provide a nuanced understanding of the planning, execution, and impact of a redevelopment at such a grand scale. Several aspects highlighted in this example demonstrate the complexities and intricacies of balancing social, environmental, and logistical considerations - serving as a worthy referential case for urban geographers.

Olympic Park Case Study Challenges

Embarking on the ambitious Olympic Park regeneration project was far from smooth sailing. It was filled with considerable challenges, both predicted and unforeseen, adding layers of complexity to the tasks at hand. Despite these difficulties, the lessons learnt and triumphant overcoming of these hurdles make the journey even more intriguing.

Discovering the Challenges in the Olympic Park Case Study

Turning a mostly neglected area of East London into an impressive, modern, and sustainable community within a strict timeline was a considerable undertaking. The difficulties faced were vast, varied, and required innovative solutions.

Some of the notable challenges recorded in the Olympic Park Case Study include:

• Geographical constraints: The location of the site, with existing water bodies and undulating terrains, posed great difficulties during construction.
• Logistical issues: Managing an operation of this magnitude, with a myriad of parties involved and time-sensitive deliveries, was unquestionably challenging.
• Environmental considerations: Ensuring the development adhered to sustainability guidelines, with an aim to minimising carbon footprint and maximising the use of recycled materials, added an extra layer to the complexities.
• Community engagement: Meaningfully involving the local community, maintaining transparency, and ensuring minimal disruption to local lives was paramount but not without challenges.

Sustainability in urban development refers to the ability to accommodate population growth and development without depleting resources, causing detrimental environmental impact, or compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Logistical issues posed a significant challenge when it came to waste management. With the commitment to using recycled materials wherever possible, managing and sorting waste effectively was both an essential part of the project and a major logistical feat.

A particularly challenging aspect was ensuring the right balance between building sporting venues for the Olympics and creating spaces that would be relevant and beneficial to the community in the long term. This dual-purpose planning required forward-thinking and versatile design solutions.

Overcoming Challenges in the Olympic Park Case Study

Despite the seemingly insurmountable challenges posed by the Olympic Park regeneration project, exceptional planning, foresight, and problem-solving skills were leveraged to turn these obstacles into opportunities and lessons for future initiatives.

The solutions employed to tackle various challenges included:

• Clever design: The geographical constraints were addressed with innovative architecture and engineering solutions, using the existing natural features as assets rather than hindrances.
• Effective project management: A robust project management strategy handled logistical complexities. This involved streamlining communication, implementing strict schedules, and enforcing health and safety regulations.
• Emphasis on sustainability: Throughout the project, sustainability was made a priority, influencing design decisions, choice of materials, waste management methods, and even transport solutions for the Games.
• Community Consultation: A series of consultations, public meetings, feedback mechanisms, and updates ensured the local community was kept informed, engaged, and accommodated throughout the process.

Project Management is the application of processes, methods, skills, knowledge and experience to achieve specific project objectives according to the project acceptance criteria within agreed parameters. It includes initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing the work of a team to achieve specific goals and meet specific success criteria.

For example, to incorporate sustainability, the project introduced measures such as green travel plans, which recommended spectators to cycle, walk or use public transport to reach the Olympic venues, thereby reducing carbon emissions. This simple yet effective method reaffirmed the foundational principles of sustainable development pledged by the project.

Overcoming these complexities demonstrated the profound ability of the team behind the Olympic Park Case Study to face seemingly daunting obstacles and evolve stronger, constructing a legacy that still stands as an exemplar in urban regeneration.

Investigating the Olympic Park Environmental Case Study

Intricately woven into the Olympic Park Case Study is the notably significant Environmental Case Study. This perspective illuminates an essential aspect of any extensive urban planning project - its environmental footprint and how it contributes to achieving a sustainable future.

Factors in the Olympic Park Environmental Case Study

Deciphering the environmental facets of the Olympic Park Case Study provides a detailed view of the careful considerations and forward-thinking strategies employed to mitigate the project's environmental impacts. The studious approach to the environmental aspect of the project gave birth to several crucial factors that facilitated a sustainable outcome.

• Sustainable Infrastructure: Building from scratch provided a unique opportunity to incorporate sustainable design elements in all the park's infrastructure. Bio-diverse landscaping, green roofs, and sustainable drainage systems were some of the implemented green initiatives.
• Waste Management: With such a colossal construction project, dealing with waste was a significant challenge. The solution lay in an exceptional commitment to recycling. This initiative not only reduced landfill waste but also minimized the need for new materials.
• Energy Efficiency: One of the key focuses was creating an energy-efficient park, which led to the construction of a combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) plant on-site.
• Water conservation: Considering England's lack of water resources, incorporating water-saving measures into the project was paramount. Rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling, and water-efficient appliances were among the applied solutions.

Greywater is relatively clean wastewater from baths, sinks, washing machines, and other kitchen appliances. It can be recycled for uses such as toilet flushing and garden irrigation , offering an effective way to save water.

For example, the Olympic Stadium's roof illustrates sustainable infrastructure implementation. Its lightweight design used 2,500 tonnes less steel than traditional construction methods, while the top covering consisted of a recyclable PVC material, thereby reducing material usage and promoting recyclability.

Remarkably, the project succeeded in achieving a 50% reduction in carbon emissions through the combined effect of sustainable construction methods, efficient infrastructure and the use of the CCHP plant.

Key Impacts From the Olympic Park Environmental Case Study

The successful execution of a sustainability-focused approach in the Olympic Park project has led to demonstrable positive environmental impacts, qualifying it as an exceptional example of eco-friendly urban regeneration.

Carbon footprint is a measure of the impact our activities have on the environment in terms of the amount of greenhouse gases we produce. It's measured in units of carbon dioxide.

A remarkable feat is the accomplishment in waste management. With a commitment to minimising waste, an impressive 98-99% of construction waste was diverted from landfill, either reused or recycled back in the supply chain.

The lasting impacts from the project are not just confined to the location itself. With its visible commitment to sustainability, the Olympic Park project has set a precedent for future developments in London and beyond.

Olympic Park Case Study - Key takeaways

• The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Case Study highlights the strategic planning, sociological insight, and environmental stewardliness involved in making a major sporting event contribute to significant urban regeneration.
• Before its transformation, the area known as the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park was characterised by industrial wasteland, rundown buildings, and a lack of sufficient infrastructure.
• The London Olympic Park Case Study showcases how sustainability was a crucial part of the construction, over 98% of the demolition materials from old structures were recycled and used in the new development.
• The Olympic Park Regeneration Case Study emphasises that the inclusion of design strategies, sustainability practices, social integration and urban planning were key to the success of the project. An example of this includes repurposing materials from the site during the construction phase as well as the creation of renewable energy sources within the park.
• The Olympic Park Case Study faced challenges including geographical constraints, logistic issues, environmental considerations and community engagement. Despite these, the project succeeded by finding innovative solutions to these problems.

Frequently Asked Questions about Olympic Park Case Study

--> how did the olympic park solve urban problems.

The Olympic park solved urban problems such as cleaning up the industrial site it was built on and working on water quality in River Lea. The athlete's village was turned into housing which was said to be affordable.

--> What were the challenges in building the Olympic Park?

There were several challenges:

• Economic - construction costs were higher than estimated.
• Education and sports - the Olympic Stadium is now used by West Ham United F.C. with high annual expenses.
• Social - businesses and people had to relocate. Furthermore, many jobs did not go to locals and construction jobs were temporary.
• Regeneration - many houses deemed 'affordable' were not actually affordable to the majority of the people, only the more affluent people. 

--> What happened to London's Olympic Park?

The London Olympic Park now serves different purposes. It was renamed Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and is open to the public for free to enjoy. The Athletes Village became East Village, a housing development. The Olympic stadium is now the London Stadium, home to the Premier League football club, West Ham United. The Aquatic Centre is London Aquatics Centre and is open to the public.

--> How has London's Olympic Park been regenerated?

London's Olympic Park has been regenerated by changing the functions of the infrastructure of the Olympic Games to serve the public and the local residents.

--> What are some of the issues involved in London's Olympic Park?

Some of the issues involving the London Olympic Park are that many properties with residents and businesses had to move to make space for the construction. Also, local wildlife was relocated for construction. The house and rental prices making it hard for locals to stay in the area.

Test your knowledge with multiple choice flashcards

Which statements are FALSE?

Why was the Olympic Park built over Stratford, Bow, Leyton and Hackney Wick?

Regenerating business developments to house companies such as Transport for London and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) bring _____ to the area.

Your score:

Join the StudySmarter App and learn efficiently with millions of flashcards and more!

Learn with 27 olympic park case study flashcards in the free studysmarter app.

Already have an account? Log in

The Olympic Park has been renamed Queen Victoria Olympic Park after the 2012 Games. 

What is urban regeneration?

Urban regeneration is when an urban area, such as a town or a city, is transformed by refurbishing buildings, building or improving infrastructure, and creating landscapes.

They were more deprived compared to the rest of the UK.

TRUE or FALSE:  After the games, the London Aquatics Centre was made accessible and affordable for the public to use.    

What was the Olympic Media Centre redeveloped into?

 The "East London Tech City" and "Here East"

of the users don't pass the Olympic Park Case Study quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

How would you like to learn this content?

Free geography cheat sheet!

Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.

Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

• Flashcards & Quizzes
• AI Study Assistant
• Study Planner
• Smart Note-Taking

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

This is still free to read, it's not a paywall.

You need to register to keep reading, create a free account to save this explanation..

Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!

By signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.

Entdecke Lernmaterial in der StudySmarter-App

Privacy Overview

• Geographical skills and enquiry
• Human geography
• Physical geography
• Careers Spotlights
• Skills Boosts

Urban regeneration case study: Kelham Island, Sheffield

This GEO unit will help you understand the processes of economic decline, regeneration and change in UK cities.

BACK TO GCSE MENU

OPEN POWERPOINT

Get in Touch

The Geographical Association 160 Solly Street, Sheffield, S1 4BF

0114 296 0088 [email protected]

Stay Social

Cookies Privacy Terms Sitemap

© 2020 The Geographical Association. Charity no. 1135148. Company no. 07139068. Website by QWeb Ltd

Urban decline and regeneration

Park Hill, Sheffield – Case study Picture Sheffield used to be a classic example of a city dependent on heavy industry. this had developed because of the area’s natural resources, iron ore, water power and coal. Local entrepreneurs and inventors also played a major role in the growth of the area’s industry.

Park Hill in Sheffield is a huge estate o flats, built up in the 1960s and designed to replace some of the slums left from the 19th and early 20th centuries that housed Sheffield’s factory workers. The new flats had many advantages, with modern amenities such as hot and cold running water and inside toilets, which had been lacking in many of the houses that they replaced. The style of construction also helped to preserve the sense of community, which was lost in some 1960s developments. However, after 40 ears the flats had become run-down and dilapidated.

In parallel, as Park Hill aged, local industry went into steep decline. Many parts of Sheffield’s city centre was devastated by the loss of industry and jobs. Unemployment, environmental blight, social problems and poverty all affected the area. Renewal of the flats was complicated by the fact that they were no longer all owned and let by the local council. Renewal of the old brownfield industrial sites was particularly difficult because the ground was polluted b the waste from the iron and steel making, requiring a massive investment to clean up the area before any redevelopment could take place.

The current plan is a good example of a partnership scheme where the local authority, a housing association and private developers work together. The regeneration of Park Hill is part of a widespread renewal of large areas of inner-city Sheffield and the Done Valley. However, the area has gradually been redeveloped through a combination of public and private investment. developments planned and built during the period of urban renewal include: Meadowhall shopping complex The nearby Robin Hood International Airport Sheffield’s tram system of urban transport The Don Valley stadium international sports venue The Advanced Manufacturing Park built by a partnership including Boeing and the University of Sheffield A new city economic development company, Creative Sheffield. which has been established to bring a variety of developments where art and commence are linked to provide jobs As this economic change is taking place, Sheffield needs to consider how to redevelop its housing stock. Park Hill, Sheffield Picture A £146 million transformation of the Park Hill estate in Sheffield got the go-ahead in January 2007 with an agreement between English Partnerships, Sheffield City Council and developer Urban Splash.

Completed in 1961, the Park Hill estate was the most ambitious inner-city development of it’s time and is recognised as Europe’s largest Grade II listed building. Covering some 13 hectares, the estate contains around 1,000 flats as well as shops, pubs and other community facilities. But to meet the needs and aspirations of the broader housing market renewal partnership, an overhaul of his historic estate was needed.

In a unique funding arrangement, the Housing Corporation committed £9.85 million up front to underpin the affordable hosing for rent and shared equity units, while English Partnerships agreed a £14.8 million grant towards the cost of redeveloping the remainder of the estate. This forward funding has allowed the refurbishment plans to progress more speedily and an additional £5.5 million from Transform South Yorkshire (the Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder) is covering the cost of tenant rehousing during the programme. English Heritage has also contributed to £500,000 towards the project costs.

Urban Splash has submitted detailed plans to modernise the total estate an along with Manchester Methodist Housing Association, to create a more balanced community.

The public commitment has brought in more than £100 million investment from the developer who is confident that it will see significant returns from Park Hill as it strives to return the estate to its former glory and restore the pride of the community

• International
• Schools directory
• Resources Jobs Schools directory News Search

Regeneration Case Study

Subject: Geography

Age range: 16+

Resource type: Lesson (complete)

Last updated

27 March 2024

• Share through email
• Share through twitter
• Share through linkedin
• Share through facebook
• Share through pinterest

Edexcel A-level Geography.

Topic 1: Regeneration

L1 - Free Download - https://www.tes.com/teaching-resource/regeneration-economy-l1-12321947

L8 - 4A.6 - Is there a case for Cranford being regenerated?

This lesson has been created to meet the teaching requirements of Topic 1: Regeneration , which is a component of the Geography Edexcel A-level course. This lesson is designed in detail and is both differentiated and engaging, and allows you to move pupils through content efficiently. As a result, this lesson should take around two hours to deliver and hits the required components of the syllabus (see syllabus code).

Made to a high standard and constructed using current research, both dual coding and retrieval practices are at the heart of this unit. A colour scheme also runs throughout to ease both your delivery and students comprehension.

This resource is a part of a scheme that covers the entire A-level topic (Regeneration ), which can be viewed using the link below.

Tes paid licence How can I reuse this?

Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 64%

A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place.

Regeneration Edexcel

Edexcel A-level Geography. Topic 4B: Regeneration Lesson 1 - Free - How do economies vary from place to place? https://www.tes.com/teaching-resource/resource-12321947 This SoW has been created to meet the teaching requirements of Topic 4B: Regeneration, which is a component of the Geography Edexcel A-level course. This SoW is designed in detail and is both differentiated and engaging, and allows you to move pupils through content efficiently. As a result, lessons take around two hours to deliver and hits the required components of the syllabus (see syllabus code). Made to a high standard and constructed using current research, both dual coding and retrieval practices are at the heart of this unit. A colour scheme also runs throughout to ease both your delivery and students comprehension. This resource is a part of a scheme that covers the entire A-level topic (Regeneration), which can be viewed using the link below. https://www.tes.com/teaching-resource/edexcel-a-level-geography-globalisation-12316420 L1: - FREE -How do economies vary from place to place? L2: How do places function and characteristics change over time? L3:How have past and present connections shaped places? L4: How has the regeneration of the San Francisco Bay area created winners and losers? L5: How can economic restructuring lead urban decline? L6: Why do places have vary priorities in terms of regeneration? L7: Why do lived experiences affect 'players' opinions of regeneration? L8: Why do lived experiences affect 'players' opinions of regeneration? L9: How is UK government policy central to regeneration? L10: How does local government policy aim to represent areas as being attractive to inward investment? L11: How can rebranding an area change its public perception? L12: How can rebranding strategies be used in a rural context? L13: What different measures are used to judge a regeneration project’s level of success? L14: How can different urban stakeholder (players) use different criteria to judge the success of a regeneration project? Free Regeneration Glossary I’m happy to answer any questions you may have prior to purchase and any feedback is of course welcome… [email protected] Useful Readings: https://www.retrievalpractice.org/why-it-works https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/dual-coding/ I hope you find this SoW useful. If you have, I have created a series of resources, one for each unit of the Edexcel B Geography course, as well as many KS3 units, all to the same standard. You can check them out here… https://www.tes.com/teaching-resources/shop/jacobspong

Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.

It's good to leave some feedback.

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.

Not quite what you were looking for? Search by keyword to find the right resource:

• 0 Shopping Cart

What’s going on with HS2?

Geography in the News > What’s going on with HS2?

HS2, or High Speed 2, is a new high-speed railway that is being built in the United Kingdom. The original plan for HS2 was to connect London to Birmingham in Stage 1, then Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds in Stage 2.

HS2 is being developed for several reasons. First, it will help to reduce congestion on existing railways and roads. Second, it will make it quicker and easier to travel between major cities in the UK. Third, it is expected to create jobs and boost the economy. One of the main justifications for HS2 was reducing the UK’s north-south divide .

HS2 trains will travel up to 225 mph, much faster than current trains. This means a journey from London to Birmingham will take just 49 minutes, compared to 1 hour and 21 minutes on current trains.

It has been said that HS2 will bring a range of benefits:

• HS2 will make it quicker and easier for you to travel between major cities in the UK.
• HS2 will help to reduce congestion on existing railways and roads by freeing up existing railways to transport more freight.
• HS2 is expected to create jobs and boost the economy.

However, critics of HS2 suggest:

• HS2 is a costly project; some argue that the money could be better spent on other things, such as education or healthcare.
• HS2 is controversial, and some people argue that it is not necessary. They say that the existing railways could be upgraded to improve capacity and that the money would be better spent on other infrastructure projects, such as new roads or bridges.
• HS2 will cut through some areas of natural beauty, and some people argue that the environmental damage is not worth the project’s benefits.

The plan to link Birmingham in the Midlands to Leeds was dropped in 2021 due to costs.

• Click to share
• Print Friendly

HS2 map – source: BBC

The first part of HS2, between west London and Birmingham, is in mid-construction, and £2.3bn has already been put towards the following sections, including acquiring land and property.

In October 2023, the UK Government announced the HS2 line between Birmingham and Manchester would be cancelled due to rising costs. The Government has proposed reinvesting the money designated for HS2 between Birmingham and Manchester into a range of transport infrastructure projects in the north. Some of these will be existing planned projects.

HS2 will run from London Euston station to Birmingham Curzon Street station via Old Oak Common station in west London.

HS2, connecting London to Birmingham, has altered subsequent stages due to financial issues, cancelling several planned extensions.

Aiming to reduce congestion and travel time between major UK cities, HS2 also seeks to create jobs and address the north-south divide.

Criticisms encompass its financial burden, allocation of funds, and environmental consequences.

The project involves extensive land acquisition and is criticised for environmental and residential disruptions.

Mid-construction from London to Birmingham, future sections have been cancelled, with funds redirected to northern transport projects.

Recent Posts

• AQA GCSE Geography Pre-release Resources 2024
• GCSE Geography Mind Maps
• Statistical Techniques in Geography Poster
• How do I revise GCSE Geography?
• Britain’s Most Desirable Towns

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)

Please Support Internet Geography

If you've found the resources on this site useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Search Internet Geography

Top posts and pages.

Latest Blog Entries

Pin It on Pinterest