slow journalism a systematic literature review

• Advanced Search

Document details

Slow journalism: a systematic literature review.

Author(s): Mendes, Inês ; Marinho, Sandra

Persistent ID: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/82077

Origin: RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho

Project/scholarship: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/OE/SFRH%2FBD%2F148831%2F2019/PT; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00736%2F2020/PT; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00736%2F2020/PT;

Subject(s): Innovation; Journalism; Perspective; Systematic literature review; Slow journalism; Tradition; Social Sciences; Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Comunicação

This paper is a systematic literature review on slow journalism, whose aim is to analyse and understand all previously done research on the subject. The review focused on four databases—Web of Science Core Collection, SCOPUS, B-ON and Communication Abstracts—and, after applying the protocol and the analysis model, a corpus of 37 papers was obtained. Data collection ended on 31 January 2022 and no starting date was defined. This analysis shows that, although the concept designation is somewhat recent it is deeply rooted in journalism, it places itself between tradition and innovation. Among other considerations, one should stress the strengthening of the connection with the audience and the idea of being an alternative way of doing, recognising, still, the need for other processes and temporalities.

This work was supported by the FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) under the grant SFRH/ BD/148831/2019 and under the project UIDB/00736/2020.

Related documents

• Back to Homepage

Handbook of Applied Journalism pp 139–166 Cite as

Journalism in Practice Studies: A Systematic Review

• Thouraya Snoussi 4 &
• Nourah Ahmed Al-Hooti   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3663-0130 5  
• First Online: 22 February 2024

72 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks of Political Science and International Relations ((SHPPSIR))

This chapter deals with the literature related to journalism in practice studies (JPS) during the years from 2003 to 2023 in the hope of recognizing the usefulness of these studies for the society, especially for journalism practitioners. The findings of the systematic review highlight the growing interest in JPS research along with the increased recognition of its perspectives over the past 20 years. The analysis provided us with many studies that were based on different disciplines and dealt with a variety of fields, such as journalism ethics and professionalism, newsroom cultures and practices, and technological shifts in journalism. Furthermore, the sample studied shows that JPS has focused on qualitative studies, including textual and narrative analyses. For this, the authors believe that the JPS literature considered in this chapter provides insights for journalist practitioners into role development, changing audience behaviors, and technological advances, allowing them to adapt and stay informed. As advances in technology continue to shape the field, JPS is keeping an eye on digital transformation, especially artificial intelligence, and looks for ways to leverage it in the practice of journalism. Thus, future research will be devoted to exploring the ever-evolving landscape of journalism and its multifaceted dimensions.

• Journalism practice
• Applied journalism
• Systematic review
• Digital transformation
• Data journalism

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Allan, S. (2018). What is journalism studies for? Journalism Studies, 19 (7), 972–974.

Google Scholar  

Allan, S., & Thorsen, E. (2009). Citizen journalism: Global perspectives . Peter Lang.

Anderson, C. W. (2013). Journalism: From tradition to practice . Routledge.

Barendt, E., & Lustgarten, L. (2005). Freedom of speech and the press . Oxford University Press.

Barnhurst, K. G., & Nerone, J. (2001). The formative years of American journalism. Journalism Studies, 2 (2), 261–279.

Boczkowski, P. J., & Anderson, C. W. (2017). Remaking the news: Essays on the future of journalism scholarship in the digital age . MIT Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Boczkowski, P. J., & Papacharissi, Z. (Eds.). (2018). Trump and the media . MIT Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature . Columbia University Press.

Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens . Yale University Press.

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter: New methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13 (5–6), 801–814.

Article   Google Scholar  

Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2017). The quantified backchannel: Digital traces on conference Twitter. Digital Journalism, 5 (6), 682–700.

Bull, A. (2018). Slow journalism and the digital disruption of news. Digital Journalism, 6 (3), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343815

Campbell, W. J., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world . Oxford University Press.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Media, Culture and Society, 39 (1), 5–8.

Dahlgren, P. (2018). Journalism and the public sphere. Journalism, 19 (11), 1405–1409.

Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6 (4), 442–464.

Deuze, M. (2007). Media work and the reshaping of journalism. Journalism, 8 (2), 121–140.

Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2018). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism Studies, 19 (11), 1537–1552.

Entman, R. M. (2012). Scandal and silence: Media responses to presidential misconduct . Wiley-Blackwell.

Entman, R. M., & Matthes, J. (2018). Media framing effects: Conceptualizing and measuring issue salience. In The Oxford handbook of political communication theories (pp. 1–18). Oxford University Press.

Franklin, B. (2009). Journalism studies at the crossroads: Challenges and opportunities in the digital age. Journalism, 10 (1), 5–7.

Franklin, B. (2016). Researching news production worldwide: Some reflections on the craft of comparative journalism studies. Journalism Studies, 17 (6), 667–680.

Franklin, B., & Murphy, D. (Eds.). (2020). Journalism in practice: Ethical and professional issues . Routledge.

Friedland, L. A., Hoveyda, A. R., & Lee, B. Y. L. (2006). Intellectual property law and interactive media: Free speech vs fair use? Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6 (1), 73–84.

Fulton, J., & Scott, P. (2022). Time well spent: ABC journalists reflect on slow journalism and the remote communities project. Journalism Practice, 16 (8), 1597–1613.

Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics . University of Chicago Press.

Galison, P., & Thompson, E. A. (Eds.). (1999). The architecture of science . MIT Press.

Garnett, J., & Lewis, D. (2009). Defamation Law and Social Media Communications in Australia: An Overview Journal of Media Law, 1 (2), 269–286.

Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781–795.

Gillmor, D. (2006). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people . O’Reilly Media.

Ginosar, A., & Reich, Z. (2020). Obsessive-activist journalists: A new model of journalism? Journalism Practice, 16 (4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1816488

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics . Cambridge University Press.

Hanusch, F. (2018). Journalism as a practice profession. In The handbook of journalism studies (2nd ed., pp. 189–205). Routledge.

Hanusch, F., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. (2019). Journalism Studies Today Journalism Studies . https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media . Pantheon Books.

Hermida A., Fletcher F., Korell D., Logan D., & Glasgow J. (2012). The Tweeted Times: Journalism Skills in the Information Age Journal of Education for Journalism and Mass Communication .

Hirst, M., & Patching, R. (2018). Slow journalism: Exploring an emerging news paradigm. In J. Bennett & N. Strange (Eds.), Digital journalism: Theory, practice and research (pp. 201–214). Routledge.

Holton, A. (2016). The elements of slow Journalism: A case study in the long-form feature. In A. Williams & M. Mair (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (pp. 287–301). Routledge.

Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2010). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect . Three Rivers Press.

Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect . Three Rivers Press.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology . Sage.

Lewis, S. C., & Usher, N. (2013). Introduction: Citizen journalism and democracy. In S. C. Lewis & N. Usher (Eds.), Citizen journalism: Global perspectives (pp. 1–18). Peter Lang Publishing.

Lewis, S. C., & Molyneux, L. (2018). A decade of research on social media and journalism: Assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and communication, 6 (4), 11–23.

Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365 (9464), 1099–1104.

Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in journalism . John Wiley & Sons.

McChesney, R. W., & Nichols, J. (2010). The death and life of American journalism: The media revolution that will begin the world again . Nation Books.

McQuail, D. (2013). Media policy: Premature obsequies? In Media power, professionals and policies (pp. 19–34). Routledge.

McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1993). Communication models for the study of mass communication . Longman.

Merriam-Webster. (2021). Journalism . In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved April 6, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/journalism

Merrill, J. C., & Fisher, D. R. (2016). Media history: Society culture technology . Routledge.

Merritt, D., & Milligan, J. (2006). A history of American journalism . Routledge.

Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology . W.H. Freeman.

Palmer, J. (2013). Environmental journalism . Routledge.

PRISMA. (2020). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 17 (3), e1003293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003293

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers . Basic Books.

Schudson, M. (1995). The power of news . Harvard University Press.

Schudson, M. (2005). Four approaches to the sociology of news. Journalism Studies, 6 (2), 115–129.

Schultz, B., Sheffer, M. L., & Sporting News. (2011). Sports journalism and society . Routledge.

Singer, J. B. (2010). Journalism ethics amid structural change: A study of international codes. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25 (4), 261–279.

Singer, J. B. (2018). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. Digital Journalism, 6 (2), 146–164.

Singer, J. B., Hermida, A., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., et al. (2011). Participatory journalism . Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). SPJ code of ethics . Retrieved from https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage.

Tuchman, G. (1978). The news net. Social Research , 253–276.

Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2009). Journalistic epistemology: Exploring the tensions between journalistic professionalism and academic research. Journalism, 10 (3), 299–319.

Ward, S. J. A. (2014). Ethics and the media: An introduction . Cambridge University Press.

Ward, S. (2015). Radical media ethics: A global approach . Wiley-Blackwell.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making . Council of Europe Report.

Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in US journalism: How do journalists think about social media? Journalism Practice, 10 (7), 844–855.

Download references

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no conflicts.

Disclosure Statement

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.

The authors received no financial support for the research.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Mass Communication, College of Communication, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

Thouraya Snoussi

Public Relations Department, College of Communication, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

Nourah Ahmed Al-Hooti

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thouraya Snoussi .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

College of Communication, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

Leon Barkho

Jairo Alfonso Lugo-Ocando

School of International Communications, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China

Sadia Jamil

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Snoussi, T., Al-Hooti, N.A. (2024). Journalism in Practice Studies: A Systematic Review. In: Barkho, L., Lugo-Ocando, J.A., Jamil, S. (eds) Handbook of Applied Journalism. Springer Handbooks of Political Science and International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48739-2_9

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48739-2_9

Published : 22 February 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-48738-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-48739-2

eBook Packages : Political Science and International Studies Political Science and International Studies (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Int J Environ Res Public Health

Understanding Social Media Literacy: A Systematic Review of the Concept and Its Competences

Karina polanco-levicán.

1 Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile; [email protected]

2 Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco 4780000, Chile

Sonia Salvo-Garrido

3 Departamento de Matemática y Estadística, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile

Associated Data

Not applicable.

Nowadays, people spend long periods on social media, ignoring the implications this carries in daily life. In this context, the concept of social media literacy, an emerging concept scarcely developed in the literature, is relevant. This study sought to analyze, descriptively, the main definitions and competences of the concept of social media literacy. The methodology included a systematic search of literature in the databases Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus between 2010 and 2021, applying filters for English and Spanish, including only scientific articles. A total of 1093 articles were obtained. An article selection process took place, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a total of 15 articles being selected. The findings indicate that the concept of social media literacy is based on media literacy to then integrate the characteristics and the implications of digital platforms. This is linked to the development of cognitive competences, where critical thinking, socio-emotional competences, and technical competences are fundamental, considering the social context. The development of socio-emotional competences stands out since social media are a frequent place of interaction between people.

1. Introduction

The transformation of society has been linked to technological changes that are an important part of people’s lives [ 1 , 2 ]. Digital technologies are inserted in aspects of social life, in families and relations with others, at work, in governance and political participation, and they generate new ways to shape a community [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. In this sense, social media are widely used by different societies, transcending the geographical borders of territories and cultures, connecting the global to the local [ 6 , 7 ]. Staying on the Internet and social media for extended periods has resulted in media and digital literacy continuing to gain importance [ 1 ].

It is important to specify that social media differ from other types of Internet platforms in that they are characterized by their mass use, they allow content creation, and are not only consumed passively, making it possible for people who do not have formal knowledge about mass media to produce information [ 8 ]. This is even more relevant considering the cross-sectional use of social media by different age groups and that children’s exposure to cell phone screens begins at an early age [ 9 ]. Later, in adolescence they spend extensive periods on social media due to their socializing with their peers [ 10 , 11 ], whereas university students spend an average of 20 h a week on such digital platforms [ 12 ], it has been reported that 98.3% of survey respondents state they use social media [ 13 ]. The opposite would mean being outside a relevant social space [ 14 ]. In the older adult population, there is evidence that they use the technology less other age groups; however, the rates of social Internet use are increasing [ 15 ].

It should be noted that users are exposed to different phenomena on social media, such as publicity, images with a positivity bias, and aggressive and violent behaviors. In addition, the way in which social media operate must be considered as they use technology to filter content based on the users’ previous choice, favoring confirmation bias [ 16 ]. They also offer the opportunity to choose with whom one wishes to interact, enabling the formation of groups or communities with similar characteristics [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], which can foster negativity against what is different, which can be particularly relevant in phenomena such as cyberbullying, which has been linked to time spent on social media [ 20 , 21 ].

Thus, there are also messages on social media that can be potentially harmful when they are about health and personal appearance [ 22 ], considering people’s exposure to advertising and photos shared with positivity biases [ 23 , 24 ]. In this sense, exposure to photos that have been manipulated to achieve a positive appearance is associated with reducing body image and body satisfaction, with the increase in the desire of young women to get cosmetic surgery [ 25 ], depending on the time spent on the Internet [ 23 ].

On the other hand, users can be confronted with demands and difficulties such as the dissemination of false and manipulated news in the post-truth era [ 1 , 26 ], which are produced and put into circulation intentionally to obtain benefits such as more visits by users [ 27 ]. This is combined with people sharing information without a review process for this content since positive feedback from other users prevails; consequently, fake news goes viral very quickly [ 26 ]. People are needed in the role of information consumers; they must develop critical thinking, i.e., a skeptical view of the selection of the news provided through algorithms and the news sources must be tracked [ 4 , 26 ], since discerning veracity or falsity is a responsibility that transcends the individual [ 5 ].

It is important to note that the use of social media is not negative in itself as it can increase social capital, foster friendships and reduce feelings of loneliness; however, it depends on the user’s characteristics and how the different platforms are used [ 28 , 29 ]. As a result, teaching and learning competences for the use of these Internet platforms are particularly relevant since they include social and ethical aspects and technical skills [ 14 ], as well as competences that can assess information that aids in better decision-making [ 30 ].

Media literacy was defined by the Aspen Institute [ 31 ] as “the ability to sensitize, analyze and produce information for specific results” (p. 6), although this conceptualization has certainly undergone progressive transformations, moving from printed information to expression and communication that includes new symbolic forms, such as images and multimedia content. In addition, social media have enabled group collaboration and the dialogue of a large number of people who produce content [ 32 ]. It is worth noting that Hobbs [ 32 ] refers in particular to media literacy and understands it as knowledge, competences, and skills for life that make it possible to participate in today’s society by accessing, analyzing, evaluating, and creating messages in different ways and in different media, being the result of media education. For his part, Buckingham [ 33 ] emphasizes the critical component and the understanding that contents are inserted in a broad context, for example, digital capitalism. The emergence of new types of literacy is linked to the appearance of Internet and mobile communication technologies, which have resulted in the appearance of new media. Considering their impact, this is occurring with technologically based sociocultural platforms [ 34 ].

In the same vein, digital literacy refers to a broad set of competences around the use of digital media, computers, and information and communication technologies (ITC), being understood as part of other forms of literacy, such as computer, Internet, media, and informational literacy [ 35 ]. Currently, efforts are being made by the international community to guarantee digital literacy [ 36 ], because since the COVID-19 pandemic time on the Internet and social media has increased [ 37 ]. It is important to mention that digital literacy has been proposed as a strategy against social inequality, given the connection between technological exclusion and wider forms of economic and social exclusion [ 38 ], because people have fewer opportunities to develop skills due to their limited Internet connection, thereby reducing participation levels [ 39 ]. Another relevant element is that it is linked to socio-economic disadvantage with a lack of knowledge about the algorithms that these types of platforms use to recommend content [ 40 ].

Literacy in traditional and digital media is central given that we live permanently receiving messages from different sources [ 41 ]. Generally, these are focused on improving people’s competences to integrate and operate in today’s society [ 42 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to promote the development of skills such as critical thinking because even though teenagers and young adults have known the world with the Internet, they do not have better developed skills in all the areas that digital literacy addresses [ 43 ]. Nevertheless, according to Leaning [ 35 ], the difficulty arises because media literacy does not sufficiently address digital technology, considering that digital literacy does not fully develop a critical approach compared to media literacy. However, it is relevant to point out that the boundaries between the types of literacy can be blurred; in addition, other proposals progressively emerge that link different approaches such as critical digital literacy, rendering the desired distinctions complex [ 44 , 45 , 46 ].

In this sense, due to their mass use, social media have transformed the way we relate to each other, form communities, and use mass media. This has been of interest, with proposals on the issue of literacy being generated that focus particularly on these digital platforms. Therefore, Livingstone [ 47 ] indicates the need for literacy focused on social media to update the analysis of media literacy. Nevertheless, this concept has limited theoretical development and little operationalization [ 7 , 48 ]. In addition, there is evidence that authors define it differently; it has not been clearly established what the competences are that are included in this type of literacy given the authors working with this concept in their research.

In light of the above, this article focuses on social media literacy by performing a systematic literature review to better understand the concept in terms of the competences it provides that adequately guide efforts in the direction of teaching and learning processes in this area. The relevance of these processes must be borne in mind due to the mass use of such platforms and their use by people of different ages for extended periods, considering there are dangers in social media while at the same time they afford possibilities for interaction, entertainment, and other options that can be useful with an adequate understanding of how social media work and how to make use of them. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze, descriptively, the main definitions and competences of the concept of social media literacy.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic search of the literature was done, considering the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [ 49 ], in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases in July 2021. The question that guided the search strategy was: what are the competences that must be developed to operate on social media? The search took place using free terms and terms from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) including social media, social media sites, digital literacy, media literacy, and social media literacy. The filters were: language (English and Spanish), number of years (from 2010 to date), and article type (article). With respect to the total articles ( n = 1039), they were first selected by relevant title, second, by relevant abstract. Then, the articles were reviewed in full ( n = 59), and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in 15 articles ( Figure 1 ).

Systematic review flowchart (Adapted from Page et al., 2020 [ 49 ]).

2.1. Criteria for Eligibility

Inclusion criteria: Articles were selected that proposed a conceptual definition of social media literacy and/or that demonstrated the competences that integrate this concept. Articles were included where the participants were children, teenagers, young adults, adults, and families. Only scientific articles, theoretical and empirical, in English and Spanish between 2010 and 2021 were included.

Exclusion criteria: Articles that address social media from digital literacy without specifically considering the scope of social media literacy were not included, since they do not define the concept, nor do they refer to the competences that social media literacy encompasses. In addition, articles that address digital platforms but do not consider social media were not included. Theses, conference proceedings, and systematic reviews were not included. Articles in languages other than English or Spanish or with a publication date before 2010 were also excluded.

2.2. Procedure

Articles were selected considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles also had to provide information that responded to the research question; therefore, those articles that did not fit as previously indicated were eliminated. Where questions or disagreements arose about the selected articles, they were resolved through the joint review by the two authors to determine their relevance and to make a decision about their inclusion.

In terms of biases of this study, the language bias was countered by including articles in Spanish and English. In terms of coverage bias, the different databases (Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed) were reviewed.

2.3. Analysis Strategy

With respect to the selection final, the articles were read and reviewed completely, observing if the records provided a conceptual definition of social media literacy or if they reported on the skills that this type of literacy includes. The other criteria of inclusion and exclusion were also considered. The standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers were also applied [ 50 ].

Later, a table was constructed to present the studies, considering first the authors, type of study, objective, and information on the sample. Then, the main results were transformed in relation to the research question to report on the studies selected and to organize the findings of this study.

In relation to the biases present in articles, generally the records describe full data in their results; moreover, the results were reported according to the analyses used, considering that this is of interest to this review.

Fifteen articles were obtained for analysis from the following countries: Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Indonesia, Singapore, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, it being observed that interest in the concept of social media literacy is concentrated mainly in European countries that develop and contribute theoretical and empirical evidence relating to this concept ( Table A1 in Appendix A ).

3.1. Social Media Literacy: Definition

The conceptualization of social media literacy is based on media literacy [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. However, it is emphasized that social media are oriented to the interpersonal communication that arises from the human need to establish interactions with others [ 48 , 52 , 53 ]. Thus, according to Vanwynsbergue [ 56 ], the focus would be on favoring the efficiency and efficacy of Internet communication, benefitting social relations ( Table A1 in Appendix A ).

On the other hand, the understanding of the particular characteristics of such platforms is worth noting, in that it is relevant how the information is presented on social media, considering the objectives after posts by both people and advertising, in addition to positivity bias [ 51 , 53 , 54 ]. Consequently, social media literacy is oriented towards the prevention of risks such as mental and physical health problems [ 51 , 53 ], as well as other types of consequences that can arise from interactions between people, for example cyberbullying, information spreading, and other difficulties [ 52 , 53 , 55 ].

3.2. Social Media Literacy: Competences

With respect to the different competences that encompass social media literacy according to the different studies, there is evidence that cognitive competences appear cross-sectionally in most of the studies searched. These include understanding, analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and the interpretation of the information, added to the assessment of the motive, purpose, realism, and credibility of the publication. Critical thinking is considered fundamental due to the large volume of information to which social media users are exposed [ 51 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. In addition, according to Schreurs and Vandenbosch [ 54 ], cognitive competences include a knowledge of traditional media literacy and the dynamics of interpersonal communication on social media ( Table A1 in Appendix A ).

Similarly, user-generated information requires that they have knowledge of the implications of sharing personal data and the generation of information considering the digital fingerprint, since this information is used by the social media platforms and shared with other companies, so the user must evaluate what content to share [ 62 ]. Likewise, Tandoc et al. [ 63 ] report on the need to raise awareness about the content recommendation algorithms that transform the social media experience.

The technical or practical competences include the ability to create, review, organize and share contents [ 57 , 58 ], access, find information and use functions such as privacy settings [ 62 ], create social media accounts and publish photos and images, and make videos and memes [ 60 , 63 ]. These competences fulfill an important role so people of different ages can perform adequately on these digital platforms [ 51 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].

On the other hand, the socio-emotional competences are integrated by several authors into the conceptualization of social media literacy because such digital platforms are oriented to the interaction between different people who share content online; therefore, management strategies for interpersonal communications are relevant [ 48 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 63 ]. Festl [ 48 ] proposes that the development of social competences is central to social media literacy including participation and moral, communicative, and education competences, consistent with other studies that lend relevance to motivation, attitude, and behavior that people on social media exhibit [ 55 , 56 ]. In addition, Schreurs and Vandenbosch [ 54 ] note that effective competences are reflected in the use of adaptive strategies when users are exposed to difficulties on social media, as indicated in Appendix A ( Table A1 ).

The proposals of authors that consider the relevance of the context in which social interactions occur as well as the language used on social media are worthy of note. Specifically, the differences between the different digital platforms must be taken into account since they have particular ways of operating [ 55 ]. Moreover, the sociocultural pragmatics in the different social media must be borne in mind, i.e., changes in the users’ language, relations, and behavior depending on the different social and cultural contexts that take place on the Internet [ 57 ]. This would make it possible to assess the context that could help discern veracity of the information [ 60 ], considering the increase in fake news [ 63 ].

4. Discussion

The objective of this study was to analyze descriptively the main definitions and competences of the concept of social media literacy. The results yielded 15 studies ( Table A1 in Appendix A ) that address social media literacy by either conceptualizing it, or by referring to the competences of which it consists. It should be noted that there are studies that, despite using the concept in their articles, do not develop it, or they use it to talk about another type of literacy without making a suitable distinction on the issue [ 22 , 64 , 65 ].

In relation to the findings of this study, the construction of the concept of social media literacy is based on the knowledge gained through media literacy, to then integrate elements focused on catching the particularities, characteristics, and implications of social media. In this context, it is fundamental to consider the social interactions produced on social media, the possibility of users creating content, the large amount of information that circulates on social media that includes user content and publicity from businesses, as well as the content filtering and recommendation technology. In the same vein, it is suggested that the concept of social media literacy could respond to the requirements of today’s society due to the mass and recurring use of these types of virtual platforms worldwide [ 47 , 48 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].

Consequently, social media literacy is an update of media literacy [ 47 ], being oriented to favoring people being able to perform adequately on social media considering the various difficulties that can arise. Without a doubt, the phenomena that occur on social media are not all negative, rather these digital platforms have benefits that could be taken advantage of better if users have greater knowledge and competences [ 28 ]. Thus, access to the benefits or opportunities that social media afford, such as the possibility of sharing with friends and relatives, should be promoted, but with strategies to protect against damaging trends or risky behaviors [ 54 ].

Generally, the analyzed studies converge in the relevance of cognitive competences in social media literacy. It is worth noting the development of critical thinking because most studies mention it being necessary to obtain a suitable understanding and assessment of the content, being aware of the reliability and credibility of the information [ 55 , 56 , 60 ], reducing the persuasive influence of mass media through the evaluation of the intention and realism of the content [ 53 , 61 ]. This is not an easy task due to the large volume of information and the anonymity of those who produce the content on social media [ 57 ]. In this sense, the knowledge about the algorithms with which social media work acquires relevance, presenting information to the user according to their fingerprint [ 40 ].

As Livingstone [ 52 ] points out, social media literacy is at the intersection between social and mass media, so that the relevance of socio-emotional competences stands out. The social interactions that take place between users in real time or delay time are one of the characteristics that distinguishes social media from other types of digital platforms or mass media; therefore, different authors have focused on the socio-emotional competences to conceptualize and operationalize the construct [ 48 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. In this way, such competences can be considered a protective factor against cybervictimization [ 66 ], and a greater prosocial behavior in Internet activities is implied [ 67 ], since there are adaptive strategies against negative experiences [ 54 ].

With respect to the technical or practical competences, there is evidence that among these are the ability to access, create, review, and share content on social media, adding other functions such as those linked to privacy settings. These competences are considered in a general way; however, social media platforms are different from each other, which is why it is relevant to consider those specific skills that could help people to perform adequately on the different social media. Coincidently, Manca et al. [ 7 ] refers to a higher skill level that can be cross-sectional on the different social media and skills specific to each digital platform.

Likewise, studies have shown the relevance of the context in which the content is generated in order to assess its construction [ 55 , 57 , 60 ]. Then, the specific platform can be considered, the context in which differences in the language used and the forms of interaction between users are reflected. On the other hand, it is important to place social media within a broader social and economic context such as digital capitalism [ 33 ], being aware of the objectives of the social media companies such as generating profits [ 68 ], transforming the private experience into merchandise [ 69 ].

Another finding of this study is the different areas in which studies are being conducted that involve this concept. On the one hand, evidence shows that different authors work with this concept applied to the area of physical and mental health related to body perception [ 51 , 53 , 61 , 70 ], developing interventions to reduce eating disorders and the negative impact of exposure to social media because they show idealized appearances, such that social media literacy is considered a protective factor [ 24 , 61 ]. Meanwhile, another group of authors focuses on research with children and adolescents due to the continuous use of social media as a result of their need to establish relations with their peers and how their families mediate the use of digital platforms [ 48 , 52 , 54 , 58 ]. Consequently, the development of competences by teenagers is fundamental for them to operate suitably on social media, considering that parents show deficiencies in technical competences and knowledge of social media because they use them less or they use digital platforms passively [ 54 , 58 ].

Finally, the relevance of the analysis and the assessment of news content on social media to determine its veracity stands out in the current context [ 5 , 26 , 60 , 63 ]. In this sense, the contribution of social media literacy is significant since it considers aspects of such platforms, because when sharing information, it prioritizes the expectation of positive feedback from other users, or that the content supports one’s personal beliefs and values.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review collaborated in the understanding of the construct of social media literacy in its definition and the skills that integrate it, being considered an area of emerging research and that its development is very necessary due to people staying on social media specifically for extended periods. Social media literacy is focused on the development of different abilities that range from the technical to the socio-emotional. In this sense, social media, by making possible and favoring social interactions, bring with them requirements for people to perform adequately on digital platforms, understanding that there is no separation between the digital plane and the physical plane; therefore, a mutual influence is produced that could affect people’s experience by being exposed to the dangers on social media that worsen without the skills to deal with such situations.

On the other hand, the social, economic, cultural, and political context is integrated into the analysis conducted on social media given that such platforms have product advertising, political announcements, and other situations to which social media users are exposed. At the same time, the social media differ from each other, so it is relevant to visualize the characteristics of each of them and their differences, noting they each have their own culture that is reflected in the language, behavior, and interactions generated.

In terms of the limitations of this study, it should be noted that there may be articles that were not detected in the systematic search, or that were not selected for the analysis considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study because the authors used concepts linked to media and digital literacy to refer to the concept of social media literacy. Other databases could be added to verify whether there are new articles and integrate them into the results, contributing to different research questions. Similarly, other types of articles such as systematic reviews or conference proceedings could be added since they were excluded here. With respect to the future lines of investigation, studies must be generated considering the construct of social media literacy and its relation to other constructs such as cyberbullying and cyberaggression as the dangers of social media are considered, making it possible to observe which competences that make up social media literacy are those that would mainly protect against these dangers. In addition, it would be interesting to identify the relations with constructs that reflect if social media literacy facilitate the opportunities that such platforms offer. Finally, other studies could broaden the inclusion criteria by incorporating articles that address social media literacy, although the authors have used other broader concepts or approaches in their research. This way, future studies could analyze and evaluate which of the different literacies that focus on social media obtain the best results.

Concept and competences of Social Media Literacy.

Funding Statement

K.P.-L. received financial support by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/Scholarship Program/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2020-21200712.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; methodology, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; formal analysis, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; investigation, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; data curation, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; writing—review and editing, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; supervision, K.P.-L. and S.S.-G.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.